You'd have to show that someone "bugged" somebody
Originally Posted by Marshall
Having an employee using their security clearance to bug the athletes does negatively affect the security agency since the Texans would find it intolerable unless they pay a hefty premium for the privilege. They have autograph sessions for those things at the proper time.
You'd also need to show how this has led to the company losing business elsewhere / previously.
You'd also need to show that no other entities approached said athlete for pictures in the same setting
You'd still be liable for claims if your existing policy suffered selective enforcement, when it regarded an off-duty employee, especially an hourly one.
"At will" is great, until you open your big mouth and say WHY the employee was let go