Originally Posted by dalemurphy
But, schaub was in the game... That was out of the fans control... So, at that point, does the team have a better chance of winning if the crowd is quiet on offense and disruptive when Oakland is on offense? Of course! But fans cared more about expressing their anger at Matt schaub than the texans winning that game.
I am not making a judgment on that, other than to highlight the hypocrisy of those who act like winning is all that matters.
In 2005, I was booing in the stands and cared more about organizational change than about the texans winning. So, I get that... Just don't bookend that behavior with diatribes about winning being more important than character and about being entitled to root for a championship team. Nobody is "entitled" as a spectator for that outcome... And certainly not those people that actively work against the winning interest of the team as they did on Sunday.
The Texans gets booed and get harsher treatment when they are on the road. That doesn't help them either, but sometime they manage to overcome that and sometimes score TD's. Why shouldn't they be able to overcome a booing crowd? Schaub didn't lead them to any TD's. And when it came time to win the game Schaub threw into triple coverage. Schaub is not a good QB and he should not have been put in the game especially since his recent play was far worse compared to Keenums bad play.