Originally Posted by IDEXAN
Tate has always been a better pure runner than Foster because he's got what
Foster doesn't have which is a real burst and also better top-end. And I think Tate in addition is a stronger, harder runner inside the tackles.
Who's the better receiver ?
Who protects the ball better ?
Who picks up the blitz better ?
Yeah , Tate's a strong runner and I like him .... wouldn't mind him starting IF he wasn't behind a superior player.