Originally Posted by Corrosion
For better or worse ....
FWIW , I believe they convict Hernandez with what circumstantial evidence they have.
I think he's guilty but couldn't convict him with what we have been presented thus far.
Well, we've been presented fragments of evidence. Based on what I've seen and read, it's hard for me to come up with a reasonable explanation of what happened where he's not the killer or at the very least one of the conspirators. It'll be interesting to see what his lawyers come up with. Everybody has their own "reasonableness" meter, so a lot will obviously depend on the jury makeup.