Originally Posted by Rey
Maybe they don't trade a third rounder for a QB if their starter was still there?
Maybe they don't go out and sign Testaverde either?
Maybe Romo ends up starting sooner if Carter had lasted a bit longer.
Originally Posted by 76Texan
Rey, the Cowboys took Henson first, then they signed Testaverde in June:
They cut Carter in August; he eventually went into rehab.
If Carter didn't have an addiction, he would have been kept, don't you think?
And if you're Bill Parcels, would you keep 3 young QBs on the roster instead of bringing in Testaverde who had played for Parcels.
Who is more likely to be the odd man out?