Originally Posted by TexasCowboy
that's right they are professional athletes and as professional athletes
they do not put themselves above the all time greats, they know what
they must do in order to achieve the respect they want
They win a Lombardi title or they continue to give the greats
the homage they rightfully have earned, there is no room at
the top for 2
There can only be 1 Romo and everyone since the triplets has known
this to be the case.
yet it seems fans still can't grasp what is the simplest of concepts
fighting over what mediocrity is the better mediocrity? the answer
is no mediocrity is better
Despite what the mediots have said repeatedly...there isn't ice cream
and cake for the runners up as a pity party cheer up!
if the Cowboys and Texans both started their inaugural seasons in 2002
then yes your statement is correct.
but here in reality your statement is false
Dallas is 5 decades ahead of the expansion Texans as far as existence
goes and light years ahead in wins including that of the post season,
division titles, conference and Lombardi title
there is no comparison between the 2 except in the fact that
both current teams are unable to achieve the ultimate prize
making them equal not greater
My statement is in no way false. Since the inception of the Texans
in 2002 (or the last 11 seasons) the Texans have won twice as many playoff games as the 'Gurls over that span
Comprehension is key!