Originally Posted by disaacks3
The bolded is pretty good evidence that he wasn't a better player LAST year than Cody.
No, that's evidence that the coaches wanted Cody to start because they felt like he was the better option to start.
You think when Arian was not playing when he got here the other backs on the roster were better than him? Or were they who the coaches trusted more at that time?
I find it hard to believe that all of a sudden when Arian played against NE he magically became a better player than the guys that were ahead of him all year.