View Single Post
Old 05-24-2013   #154
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Posts: 36,456
Rep Power: 326894 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Texans OTAs thread (5/20-21, 23, 28-30, 6/3-6).

Quote:
Originally Posted by EVOLVIST View Post
Hey, ease up on the Cialis, killah.

All I'm saying is, for a non-starter his first three years, Mitchell has so far proved his doubters wrong, including myself, who bitched like a b!tch when we took him in the 3rd.
I like what you've done. Sorry I hadn't jumped in earlier, but you make a pretty good argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EVOLVIST View Post
yet projections based upon stats are something the NFL pundits do all the time.
Fuggit... your numbers show he's been productive in the past. More productive than we perceive. That's good enough.

He's also being promoted to starter, in Wade's eyes, he's earned the spot. Imo, we need to forget what we know about the traditional NT & try to understand what Wade is doing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVOLVIST View Post
Certainly there are too many variables, but hell, I thought it was obvious that the point of my write up was more of a comparison of Mitchell vs. Cody and how enthusiasm should abound over having a clear upgrade in Mitchell.
That's the way I read it.
__________________
thunderkyss is online now   Reply With Quote