Originally Posted by Lucky
Schaub is lumped in a group between 16-23 along with Rivers and Cutler. Regardless of where you think he belongs in that group, Schaub does belong in that group based upon his performance in 2012. The Matt Schaub of 2009-2011 wiuld rank higher.
I agree with the grouping. I agree with the writer's category, "Limbo
" But I don't understand his reasoning, then putting guys like Freeman or Romo ahead of him.
He says Schaub won't win a super bowl without a dominant defense & strong running game. But Freeman will? Romo will? Rivers? Stafford? I'm not seeing it. And Schaub has had more success than all those guys recently.
Originally Posted by coon
I think that list is absurd. Schaub is in the top half of Qb's in the league IMO. I created my own list of the top 20 guys, here it is.:
4. P. Manning
5. E. Manning
6. Big Ben
8. Matt Ryan
I think this is more accurate list, someone's potential doesn't matter in this list until they reach it.
I still have a problem when people rank Flacco & Ryan better than Schaub. & you're got Ryan at way up there in the top ten.
Then Luck.... I didn't see it when he was at Stanford & I didn't see it as a rookie. Russell Wilson & RG3 were better "quarterbacks" than Luck.
Potential... yeah, I guess he's got it in spades. That might make him a QB I'd rather have, but it doesn't make him a top 10 QB. Not in this league.