Originally Posted by powda
Tony Banks for a year?
We would have won more games. Might have jacked up our draft position the next year and cost us Andre Johnson though.
I love "What if?" conversations but the further you get from the moment you change the more chance that change has to damage something that you wouldn't want to change.
But even if we took Carr (and there's no good reason to take him over Peppers) Banks should have started in 2002. That's all on that regime. At least McNair has the excuse of being ignorant at that point. Casserly/Capers/Palmer all should have known better.