Originally Posted by thunderkyss
I'm not disputing that Flacco is better than Schaub.
I'm disputing Flacco's "play-off record" is poor proof of that. Flacco has a better play off record than a lot of QBs, but he isn't better than all of them.
If you're saying that Flacco is better than Schaub because of his play of record, you're saying that Flacco is better than a lot of QBs who have not had the good fortune to play on a team that consistently fielded one of the best defenses in the NFL & one of the most prolific runners.
Flacco is better than Schaub. But using his play off record as proof is faulty logic.
Flacco has the best Playoff record fo any active QB- he's made history.
But the Pro Bowl is a measurement of what is a good QB?
Like Schaub throwing a pick in the Pro Bowl somehow makes him better than the guy getting ready to play in a Super Bowl?
WTF am I missing here?