Originally Posted by Jules Winnfield
ohh look its another great o line, great rb, great wr, great te, great defense, great coaching, great special teams + matt schaub = super bowl" thread.
dont you people see something wrong with that thinking?
what do you think is easier to achieve?
having great everything and being stuck with a mediocre qb or getting a great qb?
why is it that schaub has to have great everything before he is held accountable?
You have to go back farther than that (probably NE) to find SB winning teams that DIDN'T have dominant receiving Corps. The teams that did had number 1 or 2 ranked offenses every year.
Sig by False Start - Thanks man
Govern my country, NOT MY LIFE!