View Single Post
Old 01-15-2013   #65
Texanmike02
Site Contributor
 
Texanmike02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 36
Posts: 7,974
Rep Power: 82785 Texanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respectedTexanmike02 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Schaub + Receivers vs Other QBs and their Receivers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules Winnfield View Post
ohh look its another great o line, great rb, great wr, great te, great defense, great coaching, great special teams + matt schaub = super bowl" thread.

dont you people see something wrong with that thinking?


what do you think is easier to achieve?

having great everything and being stuck with a mediocre qb or getting a great qb?


why is it that schaub has to have great everything before he is held accountable?
2011
Victor Cruz
Hakeem Nicks
Mario Manningham

2010
Greg Jennings
Donald Driver
James Jones
Jordy Nelson
Jermichael Finley


2009
Colston
Henderson
Shockey
Meachem
Lance More

2008
Hines Ward
Santonio Holmes
Heath Miller
Nate Washington

2007
Plaxico Burress
Amani Toomer
Jermey Shockey

2006
Marvin Harrison
Reggie Wayne
Dallas Clark
Brandon Stokley


You have to go back farther than that (probably NE) to find SB winning teams that DIDN'T have dominant receiving Corps. The teams that did had number 1 or 2 ranked offenses every year.

Mike
__________________

Sig by False Start - Thanks man

Govern my country, NOT MY LIFE!
Texanmike02 is offline   Reply With Quote