View Single Post
Old 12-12-2012   #25
infantrycak
Lead Moderator
 
infantrycak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 47
Posts: 49,293
Rep Power: 413804 infantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respectedinfantrycak is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Illegal formation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luv_ya_blue View Post
So basically they just didn't have enough on the LOS?
The call was odd. My understanding is if 5 ineligible receivers are on the LOS then you are fine. There were definitely 5 OLmen on the LOS (putting aside the staggering issue). What the ref said was "76 was uncovered." Not sure if he meant Walter was ineligible because he wasn't at the LOS but was a receiver although it was a run play so him being eligible was irrelevant.
__________________
The Art of War
infantrycak is offline   Reply With Quote