Thread: Jonathan Joseph
View Single Post
Old 10-16-2012   #65
thunderkyss 
& so it begins
 
thunderkyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Age: 41
Posts: 32,268
Rep Power: 150172 thunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respectedthunderkyss is a quality contributor and well respected
Send a message via Yahoo to thunderkyss
Default Re: Jonathan Joseph

Quote:
Originally Posted by CloakNNNdagger View Post
What remains a real head scratcher to me is if you knew that JJo (and they did know this was the case) was "compromised" going into the last 2 games, especially this last game, why did we shy away from going into a layered cover scheme whether cover 2 or cover 3........especially during the second half?
Looked like they tried some rotation stuff on the back end, faking a blitz, then trying to get back... we just weren't good enough. Maybe in a few weeks, but Sunday night, they just didn't get back in time, or make their rotation in time.

Then there were times when Rodgers put the ball away from the help.
__________________
thunderkyss is offline   Reply With Quote