View Single Post
Old 08-04-2012   #97
Texecutioner
Hall of Fame
 
Texecutioner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,503
Rep Power: 101274 Texecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respectedTexecutioner is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: USA Today: Kevin Walter is not a second-rate No. 2 receiver

Quote:
Originally Posted by ObsiWan View Post
Or maybe this team/offense (being run-first and all ) values those attributes more than being a "diva" who makes the occasional highlight reel catch.
Not really fair comparison if you're going to act like the only other option would be some diva who can only make highlight reels. Your entire attitude comes off like it's Walter or doom and gloom. I'm sure there are receivers out there that can beat out 474 yards and 3 TD's.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ObsiWan View Post
Hey, if he sucks as much as you allude, then one of these younger, faster "kids" should be able to take his spot don't you think? There's certainly enough of them.
I don't recall saying that Walter sucked. Whether these young guys can be better than Walter or not isn't what this is about really. He is a great guy and a hard worker, but he is our second option at WR, and at this point, he is easily replaceable for an upgrade. The Texans should have their ears wide open for any WR's that hit the trading block throughout the season.
Texecutioner is offline   Reply With Quote