Re: The Texans a run-first team, I think not!
All this stuff is fine and dandy, but in a vacuum it doesn't mean a whole lot really.
For instance, against Miami Arian wasn't doing all that well. So instead of 2nd and 5 or 3rd and 3 were in 2nd and 8 and 3rd and 6.....
Basically we needed to rely more heavily on the pass than we did on the run because of how the game played out. I think the Raiders game was another game like that. I don't remember what was up with Tate that game, but you had Foster taking almost all the carrier with OBO getting 2 and not doing anything with them...
Also, I don't understand how you are tallying your totals. It seems like you are double dipping on plays. If we run a pass play and we take a sack or have a penalty that pushes us back it's not unreasonable that we would come out and pass again to try to make up that yardage.
Also, if it's third down or something we might come out an run it and concede the punt depending on the situation....
Basically my point is that there are so many situations and variables that can determine run or pass.
If anything I'd say overall we were balanced....
BUT my contention is that in today's pass happy NFL we are a running team. We led the league in rushing attempts and we were 30th in passing attempts. A team like the Saints, Packers or Pats will use the run as an afterthought and use their passing game a majority of the time. Those are teams that I'd call true passing teams.
Like I said, this is a pass happy league. If we had this same distribution 30 years ago then no way would people even think this was a running team. But I think the idea that we are a running team comes in relation to the rest of the league.
I said this in another thread and I'll say it here. If we aren't a running team. No one is.
Overall, we were balanced, but in comparison to the rest of the league we are a running team and we run the damn football.