View Single Post
Old 04-23-2012   #33
Lucky
Moderator
 
Lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13,990
Rep Power: 288296 Lucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respectedLucky is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Mike Mayock on 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Playoffs View Post

Doesn't diminish Mayock's relevance -- just indicates why he is.
That's my point, exactly. He's no different than Kiper in regards to ranking off of inside information.

And that's fine. It's great to get some inside info. But to sell it differently than a Schefter or Mortenson is disingenuous.
__________________
“Sprinkles are for winners” - Flo
Lucky is online now   Reply With Quote