Originally Posted by bckey
I'd rather see them take Hill or Fleener before Randle if they take a wr in the 1st but I would be ok with it. Wr is pretty hard to scout which always makes it risky in the 1st round.
agreed. i think they're better players/prospects than randle, but at the end of the day i wouldn't be mad. i still hope we pick best player available regardless tho, olb, wr, fleener, ot, g, etc.