Originally Posted by Goldensilence
Fleener fits well I think.
My only concern is Quick... I'm wary of another small school project, specially another one so early.
If I had to be bluntly honest, this staff has not proven itself capable of developing WRs at all. Which is part of the appeal to me in taking Fleener in the first.
Far as the rest of the draft... honestly I'd cream myself if this was the haul.
Hell , not liking Fleener (not the player , just the position / pick) I'd be thrilled with this draft
I would have to look at UDFA's or vet FA's to fill out the ILB spots.