Thread: The 10-6 Mock
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2012   #2
Wolf6151
Hall of Fame
 
Wolf6151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 3,436
Rep Power: 28037 Wolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respectedWolf6151 is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: The 10-6 Mock

1&2. I have no problem with the first 2 picks, this is a good year, not great, for O-linemen, and a move like this would give us a major shot of youth and talent on the O-line solidifying it for years to come. I think these first 2 picks nullify the need for #6 though. With the first 2 picks we'd get alot better at RT, RG, and in our depth as our current starters would be moved down to depth spots, Caldwell, Brisiel, and Smith would vastly improve our depth on the O-line. I seriously doubt something like this happens since Kubiak seems to be in love with Winston at RT, but if it did I'd support it. Fluker is a sophomore though so he probably goes back to school next year.
3. Broyles in the 3rd, Hmmmm? I guess this would depend on who's available. I think there might be someone better and less injured available in the 3rd since this is such a deep draft for WR, someones bound to fall a little. I'd hope for Streeter, Fuller, Criner, Toon, White, Jenkins, or Randle here.
4. Reyes, not a bad pick if he's still available. He'd add some rotational depth behind Antonio Smith. This is a weak year for D-linemen so he may go earlier just out of necessity to some teams.
5. Fangupo, I'm not very familiar with him but I think your right on the round since he's a developmental player. He's got the size but does he have the strength and athleticism?
6. See 1&2. I'd pick different here but that's just nitpicking.
7. Sharp, again not familiar with this guy but I like your line of thinking. I don't understand why more kickers aren't doing double duty in the NFL at K and P.
Wolf6151 is offline   Reply With Quote