Originally Posted by thunderkyss
I see Foster is number one on some of your lists.
Some sites has Jamaal Charles #1.
How much does last seasons' production play in your current rankings?
How much is based on factors such as talent, OL, coaching?
Does anyone think Foster or Charles is as talented, or more talented than Peterson & Johnson?
I think that Charles and Chris Johnson are equally as talented. They are the same type of runners.
I think Peterson is better than Foster, since AP has done it longer and has been that guy for years now. However, he hasn't seemed quite as dominant in the last two years when I watched him in games. Foster looked a little bit better in my eyes by watching him last season and the Texans didn't exactly have the best O line in the league either. I don't think that Foster will be a one year wonder like Slaton was. He isn't flashy, but he sees the holes extremely well and is very sturdy. He might possibly surpass AP by the end of this season if he can duplicate what he did last year.
Over all if I had to pick one RB out of all of these right now I'm taking Charles though. He's the ultimate HR hitter to me with the ball in space. When you hear most of the players around the league talk though, the majority seems to think that AP is the best guy period. From a FF standpoint, I think that Foster is the best choice because of the offense he plays in. Don't sleep on Lesean McCoy though for next season.