Originally Posted by Double Barrel
I agree. I have little respect for a coach on the NFL competition committee that leads the dirtiest team in the league. The dude is a freakin' hypocrite, not to mention a severely over-hyped coach (six winning seasons in 17 years???). And his porn 'stache was cool three decades ago already when the Village People made it popular.
Although I don't really agree with most here that Kubiak is a bad coach, I can understand the reasoning that in today's NFL, 5 years without getting to the playoffs might warrant a change.
But if you're going to change coaches, at least make it an upgrade, or else what is the point?
I've asked this before, and I'll ask it again. If Kubiak produced only 6 winning seasons in 17 years, would you be happy with that?
If not, why would you be happy with Fisher?