View Single Post
Old 01-16-2009   #27
D-ReK
RAWWWRR!
 
D-ReK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Avalon
Age: 30
Posts: 3,406
Rep Power: 685 D-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respectedD-ReK is a quality contributor and well respected
Default Re: Texans Talk Member Mock Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by badboy View Post
I am very interested in reading but not representing team. Suggestion? Would it be ok to give player's position after the name. Most us will know the guys in first round such as Crabtree but maybe not others not so well known to occasional watchers of college games such as myself.
It would probably work best if we go about this as we have in the past. This is the forum mock from before the 2006 draft. One thread is devoted to nothing but the selections. In the post where the selection is made, an explanation of the pick will be present (why this guy was picked, how he fits the system, the role he'll play the following season, etc). After a pick is made, the title of the thread is updated by a mod/admin to reflect who's "on the clock".

Meanwhile a secondary "discussion thread" is made where observers can leave their comments regarding the draft (love the pick, hate the pick, etc). If we follow these procedures, this forum mock will serve it's purpose -- enlightening the board of the needs and draft habits of teams that we don't hear about on a daily basis and elevating the general knowledge of the players available for this draft.
__________________
Smoke 'em if you got 'em...
D-ReK is offline   Reply With Quote