Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com

Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com (http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/index.php)
-   Texans Talk (http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5 (http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96690)

srrono 12-05-2012 03:00 PM

Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Nick Scurfield ‏@NickScurfield

#Texans DE @JJWatt was credited with a 2nd sack at TEN. He now has 16.5 sacks in 2012, 1 behind Aldon Smith for @nfl lead

Nick Scurfield ‏@NickScurfield

Michael Strahan had 16.5 sacks through 12 games in 2001 when he set @nfl record (22.5). @JJWatt is on pace for 22 #Texans

Dutchrudder 12-05-2012 03:05 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Well deserved. He tracked down Locker and made that play before anyone else. I believe he also got credit for the forced fumble on this play.

Watch it here

76Texan 12-05-2012 03:05 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
:fans::fans:

Say Watt 12-05-2012 03:06 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 76Texan (Post 2071978)
:fans::fans:

Your avatar is identical to my expression right now.

76Texan 12-05-2012 03:12 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Say Watt (Post 2071980)
Your avatar is identical to my expression right now.

Hello my long lost twin, LOL

Seņor Stan 12-05-2012 03:12 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dutchrudder (Post 2071977)
Well deserved. He tracked down Locker and made that play before anyone else. I believe he also got credit for the forced fumble on this play.

Watch it here

Good call!

No way Locker doesn't fall unless he is trying to avoid JJ.

TexanSam 12-05-2012 03:15 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
I hope he breaks the record, but if the Texans know where they'll be seeded by Week 16 or 17 then it's likely he doesn't break it because we'll probably rest the starters for at least a few quarters. It would be awesome if he has another 2 or 3 sack game against the Pats though, then things would definitely get interesting.

Playoffs 12-05-2012 03:15 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 

76Texan 12-05-2012 03:22 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TexanSam (Post 2071986)
I hope he breaks the record, but if the Texans know where they'll be seeded by Week 16 or 17 then it's likely he doesn't break it because we'll probably rest the starters for at least a few quarters. It would be awesome if he has another 2 or 3 sack game against the Pats though, then things would definitely get interesting.

That would be amazing, but it's gonna be hard with the nasty weather looming.

drs23 12-05-2012 03:49 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 76Texan (Post 2071994)
That would be amazing, but it's gonna be hard with the nasty weather looming.

Yep. In the 50s & rainy. Warmer than Chicago but still wet. If there's anything on the plus side is it's Field Turf at Gillette Stadium vs. the quagmire that is Soldier Field.

DocBar 12-05-2012 03:56 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 76Texan (Post 2071994)
That would be amazing, but it's gonna be hard with the nasty weather looming.

50% chance of precip. and a low of 39 isn't too awful. That there is dang good football weather. It might very well change by the weekend, though.

Rey 12-05-2012 03:58 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Earlier today I heard that it was only a 20% chance of rain...

Edit: checked here : http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/new.../339923?day=6#


That pretty much says it won't be raining that night...

Speedy 12-05-2012 05:10 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rey (Post 2072017)
Earlier today I heard that it was only a 20% chance of rain...

Edit: checked here : http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/new.../339923?day=6#


That pretty much says it won't be raining that night...

Accuweather is about the worst there is.

76Texan 12-05-2012 05:32 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by drs23 (Post 2072011)
Yep. In the 50s & rainy. Warmer than Chicago but still wet. If there's anything on the plus side is it's Field Turf at Gillette Stadium vs. the quagmire that is Soldier Field.

Why didn't I think of that ?

I think the surface itself will give our guys less of a problem than Soldier now that you mention it.

We need any traction we can get.

76Texan 12-05-2012 05:34 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DocBar (Post 2072015)
50% chance of precip. and a low of 39 isn't too awful. That there is dang good football weather. It might very well change by the weekend, though.

Like I said, I worry more about the field condition than the weather itself.

amazing80 12-05-2012 06:03 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
That was a good decision. He clearly would have had that sack. glad they did him right here


:fans:

DocBar 12-05-2012 06:18 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 76Texan (Post 2072070)
Like I said, I worry more about the field condition than the weather itself.

Field turf not 3 inch grass like Soldier Field. I'm wondering if Schaub goes Mr. Mittens after some of the throws he had against Da Bears, though. The bad part is that I'm not sure how I feel about that. :shrug:

Playoffs 12-05-2012 06:21 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
J.J. Watt is so unstoppable...


...he gets sacks on Wednesdays! :kingkong:

thunderkyss 12-05-2012 06:32 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dutchrudder (Post 2071977)
Well deserved. He tracked down Locker and made that play before anyone else. I believe he also got credit for the forced fumble on this play.

Watch it here

A sack is a sack. I'm glad Jj Watt has one more notch on his belt.

But that was no sack. That was an unforced fumble. But the ground can't cause a fumble. Behind the L.O.S. it's a live ball. But the QB didn't have the ball.

If the QB doesn't have the ball, it's not a sack.

Again, glad he got credited with the sack. It was a stupid accounting rule that stole one from him earlier, the QB had the ball behind the LOS. So in this case, it works out.

EllisUnit 12-05-2012 06:49 PM

Re: Watt credited with a 2nd sackvs TEN now 16.5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fiddler (Post 2072108)
A sack is a sack. I'm glad Jj Watt has one more notch on his belt.

But that was no sack. That was an unforced fumble. But the ground can't cause a fumble. Behind the L.O.S. it's a live ball. But the QB didn't have the ball.

If the QB doesn't have the ball, it's not a sack.

Again, glad he got credited with the sack. It was a stupid accounting rule that stole one from him earlier, the QB had the ball behind the LOS. So in this case, it works out.

He got robbed of one earlier in the season, this is just his redemption. Its all good


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger