Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com

Houston Texans Message Board & Forum - TexansTalk.com (http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/index.php)
-   Mock Draft Talk (http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=64)
-   -   Walter Mock (http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59434)

TimeKiller 03-06-2009 04:19 PM

Walter Mock
 
http://walterfootball.com/draft2009.php

No complaints, at all.

1 Matthews OLB
2 Unger C/RG
3 M Hamlin SS
4 Shonn Greene RB

are you kidding me? BANK that. Championship for reals.

The Pencil Neck 03-06-2009 04:24 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeKiller (Post 1135285)
http://walterfootball.com/draft2009.php

No complaints, at all.

1 Matthews OLB
2 Unger C/RG
3 M Hamlin SS
4 Shonn Greene RB

are you kidding me? BANK that. Championship for reals.

Some people aren't going to like the Matthews pick, but I'd take this draft.

bah007 03-06-2009 04:25 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
I would like it too.

Unger in the mid-2nd ain't bad value at all.

nero THE zero 03-06-2009 05:04 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Greene in the fourth? Not a chance in hell of that happening.

badboy 03-06-2009 05:06 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nero THE zero (Post 1135345)
Greene in the fourth? Not a chance in hell of that happening.

exactly

Specnatz 03-06-2009 05:19 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
I like the Hamlin pick, I would like him or Chip vaughn

bah007 03-06-2009 05:37 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nero THE zero (Post 1135345)
Greene in the fourth? Not a chance in hell of that happening.

There is actually talk that he may fall.

Apparently he has problems keeping his weight down and he didn't do that great in team interviews.

I still don't see him lasting through the third though.

DiehardChris 03-06-2009 05:37 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
I don't think it will ever happen - but depending on who else was available at 46, I would do BACKFLIPS if we got Unger.

I don't know if it's possible that Eric Wood would last to us at 77, but I'd love him as an alternative if we don't look at Unger.

Now - if we picked up an extra 2nd, I could see the Texans maybe taking a C there.

Maddict5 03-06-2009 05:38 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
he also has us taking a DT with our second 4th (thanks sage)

window shopping.

1- Clay but i hate how it worked out tbh. trade down would be best
2- Louis Delmas, S, W Michigan
3-Antoine Caldwell, C, Alabama
4a-Andre Brown, RB, NC State
4b-Tyronne Green, G, Auburn

painekiller 03-06-2009 06:36 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nero THE zero (Post 1135345)
Greene in the fourth? Not a chance in hell of that happening.

I can see him falling, he is an older back and a lot of teams will not be interested in him because.

Spled 03-06-2009 07:08 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
If we go linebacker then trade down.

mussop 03-06-2009 07:20 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 1135436)
I can see him falling, he is an older back and a lot of teams will not be interested in him because.

I agree I wouldnt be surprised at all to see him fall into the 4th round.

If we get Unger and Mathews I will be so happy i'll have to have plastic surgury to remove the smile from my face. They are perfect fits for this team IMO. I dont think any other OL in this draft fits the ZB scheme better than him.

LonerATO 03-06-2009 07:35 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
this is a better mock then he had up a few days ago with the texans taking maclin in the 1st

mussop 03-06-2009 07:56 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Time to cherry pick.

1 Matthews OLB
2 Unger C/RG
3 Lawrence Sidbury, DE/OLB,
4 Emanuel Cook, SS, South Carolina

:cowboy1: That would be an incredible draft.

Goatcheese 03-06-2009 08:27 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeKiller (Post 1135285)
http://walterfootball.com/draft2009.php

No complaints, at all.

1 Matthews OLB
2 Unger C/RG
3 M Hamlin SS
4 Shonn Greene RB

are you kidding me? BANK that. Championship for reals.

All good players, and I'd be happy if things fell this way. Especially the Hamlin/Greene picks.

Mathews is a bit of a reach, and has alot to prove, but I can see it happening.

Wolf6151 03-06-2009 08:33 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeKiller (Post 1135285)
http://walterfootball.com/draft2009.php

No complaints, at all.

1 Matthews OLB
2 Unger C/RG
3 M Hamlin SS
4 Shonn Greene RB

are you kidding me? BANK that. Championship for reals.

I don't like Matthews in the 1st, he's not a 4-3 SLB, he's a 3-4 pass rushing LB or maybe a 4-3 WLB, he just doesn't fit at 4-3 SLB, he's never played in pass coverage. I'd much rather have Cushing in the 1st, I'm not totally sold on him either but at least he fits our system. I love the Unger and Hamlin picks, but I also think there's no way Greene last to the 4th round.

beerlover 03-07-2009 02:12 AM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Cushing to Bills English to Bears then says Bills could go English. great freaking great.

painekiller 03-07-2009 01:15 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf6151 (Post 1135498)
I don't like Matthews in the 1st, he's not a 4-3 SLB, he's a 3-4 pass rushing LB or maybe a 4-3 WLB, he just doesn't fit at 4-3 SLB, he's never played in pass coverage. I'd much rather have Cushing in the 1st, I'm not totally sold on him either but at least he fits our system. I love the Unger and Hamlin picks, but I also think there's no way Greene last to the 4th round.

You do realize the WILL LB is higher on the food chain then the SAM LB? So saying that Matthews is a WILL is actually saying his position is the higher desired position.

Now why is the WILL higher desired than the SAM? Because the SAM does not play in the nickle package, and teams play the nickle almost 50% of the defensive plays. An offense can scheme a SAM off the field, by going 3 wide and then your 1st round pick is on the bench watching.

So I say Matthews being able to play the WILL is a good thing. Also this team has not had a true WILL LB since we have gone to the 4-3, so it's time to draft one.

TexansSeminole 03-07-2009 01:18 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 1135728)
You do realize the WILL LB is higher on the food chain then the SAM LB? So saying that Matthews is a WILL is actually saying his position is the higher desired position.

Now why is the WILL higher desired than the SAM? Because the SAM does not play in the nickle package, and teams play the nickle almost 50% of the defensive plays. An offense can scheme a SAM off the field, by going 3 wide and then your 1st round pick is on the bench watching.

So I say Matthews being able to play the WILL is a good thing. Also this team has not had a true WILL LB since we have gone to the 4-3, so it's time to draft one.

That may be true but if the Lions take Curry I'd bet you that Curry at SLB will be in on nickel packages. He and Ernie Sims both will be their nickel backers. Kind of scary if you ask me.

Maddict5 03-07-2009 03:44 PM

Re: Walter Mock
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 1135477)
Time to cherry pick.

1 Matthews OLB
2 Unger C/RG
3 Lawrence Sidbury, DE/OLB,
4 Emanuel Cook, SS, South Carolina

:cowboy1: That would be an incredible draft.

..and with our second 4th, a big rb


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger