PDA

View Full Version : Wade Phillips conference call


texanchris
02-01-2011, 05:30 PM
Texans defensive coordinator Wade Phillips recently took part in a Town Hall Conference Call with season ticket holders. The following is a transcript of his interview.

Texans defensive coordinator Wade Phillips
(On his experience coaching at the East-West Shrine Game) “It went real well. I enjoyed working with the kids there. I think we got some inside information on some of them. So that helped too. We had a nice week and there’s a lot of good young players that played in that game. I’m looking forward to talking about them.”



(On being a coordinator after a head-coaching stint) “Oh I think it’s great, because of where it is, and who I’m working with and for. I think that’s the key thing. Any time I’ve gone as a coordinator, I’ve really kind of picked my spots as far as who I work for. I’m talking about organizations and also the coach that I’m coaching for. So both those things are great here, and I’m looking forward to coming back.”



(On how DE Mario Williams fits into a 3-4 defense) “The great players fit into any defense. I’ve had Bruce Smith, Reggie White, you name them. Elvin Bethea is in the Hall of Fame, too, at defensive line. The great players like Mario, what you do is you try to get them in position to make plays. It doesn’t matter what the front is. It’s where you place them. I think that’s the key thing with him. We try to get him in a spot where he can make plays, and really, 3-4 or 4-3 really doesn’t make that much difference. It’s where you place the player. We’re going to try to put him in a position where he can make plays the best.”



(On if Williams can be moved around in order to surprise offenses) “Sure. From what I’ve seen so far, and from what I knew about him coming out, you want to put him in a situation where you don’t want him against their best lineman. If you can help it, you put him against their worst lineman in some cases. We’ll always be trying to do that. But he’s so good, you can put him in one spot and let him go. Like I said with Bruce Smith, we didn’t move him around a whole lot. We just let him play.”



(On how his 3-4 defense is different than Pittsburgh and Green Bay’s) “If you put the Jets in there, three out of the four teams are 3-4 teams. It looks like the league is going back that way. At one time, we had I believe 22 teams that ran a 3-4. In fact, the Pro Bowl was picked 3-4 for awhile. It looks like teams are going back to that. It’s different in some ways. Technically, we’re not a 2-gap completely. Some of those teams are 2-gap, although they say that and then they don’t normally play that way. But that’s probably the only difference. The nose guard doesn’t play 2-gap all the time, unless he can. I had Ted Washington in the Pro Bowl. I’ve actually had four different nose guards in the Pro Bowl. It depends on what the nose guard can do, as to what he plays. We’re going to tailor it to our personnel, not to what I can think of. But it’s going to be out of a three defensive lineman setup because of the pass rush you can get.”



(On if the nose tackle has to be extremely large) “Again, it’s about what they can do. Jay Ratliff is about the size of the couple of guys that we talked about that are already with the Texans. He’s not any bigger than they are. He’s been the Pro Bowl nose guard for two out of the last three years. Greg Kragen I had in Denver was in the Pro Bowl at nose guard, and he was smaller than the guys we have at nose guard. It’s not particularly about size. It’s what you do with them, and what kind of players they are. I think that’s a common misconception: that they have to be giant players to play 3-4, and we’ve been playing with guys that aren’t giant players. Bruce Smith was about 270 when he played. He played pretty well in that defense. Like I said, Jay Ratliff’s about 275 at nose guard. So it’s the player himself and what he can do. If he can stunt a lot, and he’s quick, then we use him that way. If he’s big and huge and can’t move much, then we’ll play more solid up on the guy. I’ve been at it a long time, I know a lot of defenses, but it comes down to the players. Not what I can do. What they can do."



(On what role LB Brian Cushing will have in his defense?) “Well I think he’s an outstanding player. Again, it’s not hard to fit those guys into any type of defense. Especially guys that can move. You put them somewhere in the middle where they can go to the football. That’s great thing about the 3-4: you can actually have two guys in the middle that can go to the football. If you have that, then they can make a lot of plays. Through the years, especially when I’ve had two really good ones together, both of them have made over a hundred tackles, both inside ‘backers. So it’s a good position to play.”



(On what he needs to do with the secondary to improve it) “Right. If you ask the secondary coach, ‘What’s the difference in coaching a 3-4 or a 4-3?’ and he’ll say ‘None’. Because there isn’t any. You just have four players back there, and a lot of the coverages are similar. We have some different coverages than people have. I think those coverages will help us. We’ve always been able to improve in that area. Usually that’s the area that when I go in as a defensive coordinator, which I have several times, and the last four times, really, that was the problem. The secondary had not played well, and we had outstanding years. I think we can help, secondary-wise.”



(On how you help instill confidence in defensive players) “You first of all, try to find out their strengths and weaknesses and put them in a position where they can utilize their strengths. It’s like I said with the nose guard or with anybody else: they may have the same assignment, but we’ll teach different guys different ways. For instance, at cornerback, some cornerbacks can jam well and hold them up at the line, but we’ll play them more that way. Whereas another corner plays the exact same position, we’ll play him off because he plays better that way. Again, you fit what the players can do to the system. Not what the system can do what you think players can or can’t do.”



(On his impressions of LB DeMeco Ryans) “He’s everything they say: he’s an outstanding individual that evidently is really a hard worker too. Not only is he a smart player, but from all I hear he works hard at his craft. I think that’s very important for a guy who’s definitely a leader on the team. You can tell that from all the coaches I’ve talked to, and players. They say he’s a real leader on the team. He’s everything you want.”



(On how much the Collective Bargaining Agreement affects working in a new system) “Ours is player-friendly. There are a lot of things we can teach real quickly. I think that’s the good thing about that part of our system. Is the learning part is going to be player-friendly. We can do it pretty quickly. Us finding out what the player can do and how he can play and those kind of things, I’m coming on staff, and Gary (Kubiak) knows those things, and we have other coaches on staff, (like) Bill Kollar that can help me with those type of things as far as what the player can do. And I’m looking forward to that.”



(On new LB coach Reggie Herring) “He’s an outstanding coach. He’s very dedicated to what he does, like most coaches are. But I think even more so than any of the coaches that I’ve been around. He’s really an outstanding coach. The players love to play for him. He works them hard. But he gets a lot out of them. He adds a lot to what we’re doing, plus, he knows what we’re going because we’ve been doing it for the last three-and-a-half years.”



(On if Herring’s experience as a college defensive coordinator will help) “Sure. I think that certainly helps. Reggie’s an extremely smart guy, and that certainly helps too. But he has a good feel, and has good leadership qualities too and I think that’s important with a coach. You talk about players a lot as far as leadership, but you have to have leaders as coaches, and Reggie is definitely one of those.”



(On his thoughts about defensive line coach Bill Kollar) “Bill’s revered throughout the league, especially for teaching pass rush. You can see it on the players and how they come off the ball and those kind of things, from the tape that I’ve watched. But he’s very enthusiastic, and you need a coach that’s a really enthusiastic guy. It takes all kind of coaches, but he’s one that’s very enthusiastic and gives you that zing that you need as far as player and a coach, so I think he’s going to add a lot there.”



(On his thoughts about new defensive backs coach Vance Joseph) “Vance has been in the same system we’ve been in for awhile. Billy Davis coached as a defensive coordinator for San Francisco and worked with Vance. Then Greg Manusky, the defensive coordinator the last four years, and he worked with Vance, and both guys said he’s one of the most outstanding coaches they’ve ever been around. Plus, he’s been in our system. Both of those guys worked with me and ran the same 3-4 system that we teach here. It was an easy transition that way.”



(On how much personnel input he’ll have) “I’ve always prided myself that I do a good job of evaluating personnel. I’ll say my two cents and I’ll think they’ll realize with my experience in some areas, especially in picking personnel, that I can help. That’s what I’ll try to do. But I have been a head coach, and people think ‘Well gosh, every defensive player, he’s going to want, and no offensive players.’ But that’s not the case. It’s whoever the best players are. When I first went to San Diego, again they had a really terrible year on defense, and a good offense, and we picked Phillip Rivers with the first pick. We won 12 games the first year. It’s not just picking a defensive player that makes the difference. It’s whatever’s best for your team. That’s what I’m for.”


No real suprises, looks like Cushing will be playing inside linebacker this year. I hope he will help with the defensive personel and help turn that side of the ball around.

Ole Miss Texan
02-01-2011, 05:43 PM
I think Phillips is going to make such a difference. I love the way he discusses the personnel and scheme. He says every player is different and they coach the individual player to maximize his potential. I think that's what went wrong the last 5 years. I feel like they've wanted a 4-3 run a certain way and found the best players they thought could perform how they wanted them to. Phillips is going to adapt the way he attacks an offense depending on the personnel. This is awesome.


Whether we really desperately "need" him or not.... I hope Phillips is constantly in Kubiak/Smith/McNair's ears. When they're awake and when they're asleep. Just whispering, "Nnaaamdi. Asooomuuughaaa. Nnaaaamdi. Asooomuuuughaaa."

dc_txtech
02-01-2011, 06:09 PM
Thanks for posting that. I would rep ya if I could.

JCTexan
02-01-2011, 06:53 PM
Thanks for posting that. I would rep ya if I could.

Got him for you.

Double Barrel
02-01-2011, 06:57 PM
Wade sounds like 100 times more of a head coach than Gary. It's refreshing and depressing at the same time! :goodbad:

Wolf6151
02-01-2011, 07:11 PM
Got him for you.

Me too.

JB
02-01-2011, 07:12 PM
Wade sounds like 100 times more of a head coach than Gary. It's refreshing and depressing at the same time! :goodbad:

Hopefully Gary is a good learner

Double Barrel
02-01-2011, 07:14 PM
Hopefully Gary is a good learner

For his sake. :kubepalm:

steelbtexan
02-01-2011, 08:08 PM
Hopefully Gary is a good learner

It's sad that after 5 yrs you are having to make this statement.

False Start
02-01-2011, 09:15 PM
Hopefully Gary is a good learner

I heard he has been studying hard on when to throw the red flag. :redtowel:

JB
02-01-2011, 10:06 PM
For his sake. :kubepalm:

Yes!

It's sad that after 5 yrs you are having to make this statement.

I know!

I heard he has been studying hard on when to throw the red flag. :redtowel:

He better be studying on everything!!! :pissed:

thunderkyss
02-01-2011, 10:13 PM
Wade sounds like 100 times more of a head coach than Gary. It's refreshing and depressing at the same time! :goodbad:

Well, this isn't exactly the area Kubiak has been lacking in. Everything Wade says, Kubiak has said more or less.

Kubiak has had more success with finding what players do & putting them in position on the offensive side of the ball. Defensively, he pretty much gave them every draft... pretty much saying the same things Wade is saying.

Gary's problem is more of a game management thing.

IDEXAN
02-02-2011, 06:58 AM
"Like I said, Jay Ratliff’s about 275 at nose guard. So it’s the player himself and what he can do. If he can stunt a lot, and he’s quick, then we use him that way."
**********************
NT Ratliff played at only 275 ?

El Tejano
02-02-2011, 09:19 AM
Here is what I got out of that and what I think is going to be with our defensive side.

I like that he basically stated over and over that he coaches to the players strength. This leads me to believe that if he sees a guy like Antonio Smith excelling at the NT position and/or a guy like Mark Anderson excelling in a two point stance, he's going to put them there.

I think Cushing and Demeco are going to do well playing so close together in the middle. Cushing tends to give a better pass rush up the middle than Demeco does and I believe both of them have alot of respect from the defensive players.

One thing that I always liked about Demeco was that when he came into the league he prepared and studied the defense very well. So much so that he was moved from OLB to MLB to lead the defense. Having a new system will now allow Demeco to show the others how to prepare for this defense.

Probably the best part of this interview was that Wade Phillips stated he prides himself on selecting personnel. Seems to me that Kubiak selected the personnel for Richard Smith and mostly for Frank Bush. Now we got a DC who selected the guys he wants. and that right there may make the most difference on our team. That was really good to hear.

Vinnie
02-02-2011, 09:29 AM
Wade sounds like 100 times more of a head coach than Gary. It's refreshing and depressing at the same time! :goodbad:

He will be our head coach after Gary fails next season.

dc_txtech
02-02-2011, 10:06 AM
"Like I said, Jay Ratliff’s about 275 at nose guard. So it’s the player himself and what he can do. If he can stunt a lot, and he’s quick, then we use him that way."
**********************
NT Ratliff played at only 275 ?

I was wondering about that as well. He's listed at 303 on NFL.com.

nero THE zero
02-02-2011, 10:48 AM
Is this the first time he's confirmed that Cushing will be playing in the middle? I know when he first arrived, he said via a McClain article that he wasn't sure whether Cushing would play inside or outside.

Also interesting that he's still noncommittal on what exactly Mario's role will be.

Ole Miss Texan
02-02-2011, 11:00 AM
Also interesting that he's still noncommittal on what exactly Mario's role will be.
I think he's basically been saying he's going to consistently put Mario in a position to get upfield and rush the QB.

Second Honeymoon
02-02-2011, 12:42 PM
Is this the first time he's confirmed that Cushing will be playing in the middle? I know when he first arrived, he said via a McClain article that he wasn't sure whether Cushing would play inside or outside.

Also interesting that he's still noncommittal on what exactly Mario's role will be.

I like how he wanted Mario matched up with their worst OL. Yeah, that is about the only time Mario does anything that is for sure. Any time he goes up against a legit LT he gets owned. I still remember a near-retirement Ogden just making Mario invisible against the Ravens a few years back. Mario has never dominated anyone who was worth a crap. he feasts off of TEs, RBs and third rate personnel.

I say put his ass on the bench if he can't produce against good talent. Other guys come in without the salary cap hit and can make plays against the best. Mario just kinda sucks sometimes...and it sucks because he could be good if he gave a decent amount of effort.

TheCD
02-02-2011, 12:55 PM
I like how he wanted Mario matched up with their worst OL. Yeah, that is about the only time Mario does anything that is for sure. Any time he goes up against a legit LT he gets owned. I still remember a near-retirement Ogden just making Mario invisible against the Ravens a few years back. Mario has never dominated anyone who was worth a crap. he feasts off of TEs, RBs and third rate personnel.

I say put his ass on the bench if he can't produce against good talent. Other guys come in without the salary cap hit and can make plays against the best. Mario just kinda sucks sometimes...and it sucks because he could be good if he gave a decent amount of effort.

Honest question here, so I hope it doesn't come across as sarcastic. Do you have an idea of how Mario produces (sacks, hurries, hits, tackles) against different personnel, as well as top-tier offensive talent? I tend to hear he doesn't do well against great LTs all the time (which I am inclined to believe), but I can't help but think that I've seen him show up before. Keep in mind, too, that the great LTs surely don't give up many sacks per year, regardless of the talent level they are facing.

HOU-TEX
02-02-2011, 01:01 PM
I think Phillips is going to make such a difference. I love the way he discusses the personnel and scheme. He says every player is different and they coach the individual player to maximize his potential. I think that's what went wrong the last 5 years. I feel like they've wanted a 4-3 run a certain way and found the best players they thought could perform how they wanted them to. Phillips is going to adapt the way he attacks an offense depending on the personnel. This is awesome.

Whether we really desperately "need" him or not.... I hope Phillips is constantly in Kubiak/Smith/McNair's ears. When they're awake and when they're asleep. Just whispering, "Nnaaamdi. Asooomuuughaaa. Nnaaaamdi. Asooomuuuughaaa."

Agreed! I don't recall our previous DC's ever saying something like this. Putting the players in the best position to succeed...hmmm, what a novel idea. It's a breath of fresh air compared to the ole "we're going to be aggressive", "we're going to shoot the gaps" or "we're going to read then react" bullshit.

Texanmike02
02-02-2011, 01:17 PM
I like how he wanted Mario matched up with their worst OL. Yeah, that is about the only time Mario does anything that is for sure. Any time he goes up against a legit LT he gets owned. I still remember a near-retirement Ogden just making Mario invisible against the Ravens a few years back. Mario has never dominated anyone who was worth a crap. he feasts off of TEs, RBs and third rate personnel.

I say put his ass on the bench if he can't produce against good talent. Other guys come in without the salary cap hit and can make plays against the best. Mario just kinda sucks sometimes...and it sucks because he could be good if he gave a decent amount of effort.

The reality is that even pedestrian LTs win 90% of the time. Even when they are pitted against the GOAT. What is a GREAT year by definition for a DE? 16 sacks? 18?

Conservatively, lets look at 30 offensive passing plays in a game X 16 games. That is 480 snaps in a season. That means that a great season means putting a QB on the ground 3.3% of the time. If you look at hurries and knockdowns and define them as great... what are you looking at? 30 total sacks and hurries maybe 35? A great season by a DE is success between 3-8% of the time. Most LT's own most DE's MOST of the game.

Mike

Ole Miss Texan
02-02-2011, 01:35 PM
The reality is that even pedestrian LTs win 90% of the time. Even when they are pitted against the GOAT. What is a GREAT year by definition for a DE? 16 sacks? 18?

Conservatively, lets look at 30 offensive passing plays in a game X 16 games. That is 480 snaps in a season. That means that a great season means putting a QB on the ground 3.3% of the time. If you look at hurries and knockdowns and define them as great... what are you looking at? 30 total sacks and hurries maybe 35? A great season by a DE is success between 3-8% of the time. Most LT's own most DE's MOST of the game.

Mike

That's very interesting Mike, I've never gone through any analysis that way. Nicely done.

When Mario Williams was drafted #1 overall, we all expected him to completely dominate every snap and take over games. Because of that, I truly think we had such high expectations, that so many fans think he's a failure.

Is Mario the greatest of all time? No, but he is still one of the best DEs in the entire league. I think he has a ton more potential than what we've seen and has room to grow. That I think is a good thing b/c to be honest, I already like what I have witnessed from him.

He does have a lot of sacks from being unblocked or when TEs cover him. But who's fault is that? Honestly! If opposing offenses are that naive, shame on them. Mario exploits that. That's like not giving WRs/QBs credit for TDs when a LB is the one responsible for coverage. Who's to say Mario wasn't put in that position to expose the weakness of the Offense? That's what he's supposed to do and we're discounting this? Crazy. Mario does get sacks from pressure caused by other defenders. But so does every other DE. Mario also causes pressure that allows our other defenders to make plays. That's the team aspect of the game.

Mario has also beat his fair share of Tackles one on one. Another thing he does that makes him such a well rounded DE... one of the most well rounded DEs is his ability to take on and release from Linemen. There's tons of instances where he's even doubled teamed, gets off the linemen and makes the tackle on the RB.

All this Mario hate is crazy. He makes his fair share of positive plays. And yes, I would like to see more of it but I am NOWHERE near saying "bench him". That's laughable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ1MfrpJFv4

Just take a look at the clip. Some say he's unblocked on some plays. Well the truth of the matter is the offense sometimes pulls a guard to block the DE. That is common. Mario just blew right by the OG and it looks like he was unblocked. come on now.

TimeKiller
02-02-2011, 01:50 PM
Utilizing strengths? Putting players positions to utilize their strengths and make plays? Holding players accountable for the future success or failure of this new defensive regime?

Jeeeeez.....

Wade's inspiring a little confidence with this....at least for me. I could have the tone totally wrong but through reading the article it sounds like he was on the verge of saying "JFC will you morons at the moronicle forget about the numbers 3 and 4? It's called "DEFENSE". I have it. You need it. STFU about who stands where pre-snap already."

infantrycak
02-02-2011, 02:31 PM
All this Mario hate is crazy.

The rest was well said, but this was all that needed to be said.

HOU-TEX
02-02-2011, 02:42 PM
Personally, when healthy, I think Mario's a beast and can beat whoever he lines up against. However, I also think there's a lot left to be tapped. I truly hope Wade's not blowing smoke up our collective ass by saying what he has about having Mario play in the best positions for success.

JB
02-02-2011, 02:46 PM
Personally, when healthy, I think Mario's a beast and can beat whoever he lines up against. However, I also think there's a lot left to be tapped. I truly hope Wade's not blowing smoke up our collective ass by saying what he has about having Mario play in the best positions for success.

I truly think that Mario will be moved all over the place, and a part of the defense will be disguising what he will do on a particular play. Sometimes he will line up as a DE, sometimes OLB, and sometimes even at NT. Mario is a beast in both the run game and pass game, and OC's have to gameplan for his impact.

steelbtexan
02-02-2011, 03:19 PM
Personally, when healthy, I think Mario's a beast and can beat whoever he lines up against. However, I also think there's a lot left to be tapped. I truly hope Wade's not blowing smoke up our collective ass by saying what he has about having Mario play in the best positions for success.

MW has underachieved. Mostly due to injury. But his history says he hasn't been a high intensity every play type guy. (Ex. Dumervil)

With that said all of that's in the past. The party's over and were about to find out if MW is more like Bruce Smith or Antonio Smith.

It's MW's legacy and what he wants to make of it. There are no more excuses. The DC/DL coaches are as good as it gets and have coached/taught HOF DE's. It's on MW now.

thunderkyss
02-02-2011, 05:52 PM
The rest was well said, but this was all that needed to be said.

If Mario isn't a P.O.S. then how can we ague what a terrible job we've done in the draft?

Sure we were praising the Smithiak team just 10 months ago... but things have changed. They are now garbage & everything they've done here is wrong.

drs23
02-02-2011, 07:01 PM
I truly think that Mario will be moved all over the place, and a part of the defense will be disguising what he will do on a particular play. Sometimes he will line up as a DE, sometimes OLB, and sometimes even at NT. Mario is a beast in both the run game and pass game, and OC's have to gameplan for his impact.

MW has underachieved. Mostly due to injury. But his history says he hasn't been a high intensity every play type guy. (Ex. Dumervil)

With that said all of that's in the past. The party's over and were about to find out if MW is more like Bruce Smith or Antonio Smith.

It's MW's legacy and what he wants to make of it. There are no more excuses. The DC/DL coaches are as good as it gets and have coached/taught HOF DE's. It's on MW now.

Agree with both points. Well said.

Double Barrel
02-03-2011, 11:57 AM
Well, this isn't exactly the area Kubiak has been lacking in. Everything Wade says, Kubiak has said more or less.

Of course, to your ears. You didn't even have to admit it for me to already know it.

But the fans I talk to tell me how refreshing it is to hear Wade speak about football. There are no trap doors or mealy-mouth platitudes that you have to try to decipher. His confidence as a coach is quite evident, and he exudes an aura of a head coach that is just not there with Gary. Kubiak's demeanor comes across as uncertain and insecure, and this comes from a reporter who talks to him weekly (Bob Allen).

Kubiak has had more success with finding what players do & putting them in position on the offensive side of the ball. Defensively, he pretty much gave them every draft... pretty much saying the same things Wade is saying.

I'm not going to advocate a position that Gary has done nothing right. His offense is clearly one of the successes of his tenure. Perhaps the offense and a sole 9-7 record are his head coaching highlights, but highlights nonetheless.

But I find this position from you to be hilarious in it's schizophrenic presentation. YOU have been the one heavily criticizing this offense all season for consistently failing to do much in the first half of games, and rightfully so as the position it put our already taxed defense in made things worse.

And for you to now reverse those months and month of offensive analysis in order to support a take now that undermines your oft-stated position...well, you are burning your own bridge of credibility.

Gary's problem is more of a game management thing.

That's one of them. But if you think that's the only one as the HEAD COACH with a 37-43 record after six seasons, then it's clear that you've chosen to wear blinders that prevent you from seeing any bigger picture.

thunderkyss
02-03-2011, 01:53 PM
Of course, to your ears. You didn't even have to admit it for me to already know it.

But the fans I talk to tell me how refreshing it is to hear Wade speak about football. There are no trap doors or mealy-mouth platitudes that you have to try to decipher. His confidence as a coach is quite evident, and he exudes an aura of a head coach that is just not there with Gary. Kubiak's demeanor comes across as uncertain and insecure, and this comes from a reporter who talks to him weekly (Bob Allen).


We'll see how much confidence people have in Wade's words five years from now. I remember clearly, how we fans, & the media were confident that Gary's confidence would lead to more success than we've seen.

thunderkyss
02-03-2011, 02:05 PM
But I find this position from you to be hilarious in it's schizophrenic presentation. YOU have been the one heavily criticizing this offense all season for consistently failing to do much in the first half of games, and rightfully so as the position it put our already taxed defense in made things worse.

And for you to now reverse those months and month of offensive analysis in order to support a take now that undermines your oft-stated position...well, you are burning your own bridge of credibility.


I'll give credit, where credit is due. Is this one of the better offenses in the league? Sure is.

Has Gary been able to build this offense without fleecing our draft picks away from the defensive side of the ball? Yes.

Is this offense all that it should be?

I don't think so.

I know what the stats say, but IMO, 5 years of the guru, we should be able to pass at will, we should be able to run at will, we should be able to score at will.

Kubiak has been able to do on offense, what we all hope Wade can do for the defense. Kubiak doesn't need studs at every position to make them competitive. Had he been able to put those high draft picks on offense, maybe we could be that offense.....

5 years, long enough for me. I'm not arguing that Kubiak should have stayed. I think he should have gone. I do not agree with McNair, & I'm only trying to make sense of it, so I can move forward.

IMO, this is a bold move by McNair. & I'll be rooting for it to work.

HOU-TEX
02-03-2011, 02:13 PM
I'll give credit, where credit is due. Is this one of the better offenses in the league? Sure is.

Has Gary been able to build this offense without fleecing our draft picks away from the defensive side of the ball? Yes.

Is this offense all that it should be?

I don't think so.

I know what the stats say, but IMO, 5 years of the guru, we should be able to pass at will, we should be able to run at will, we should be able to score at will.

Kubiak has been able to do on offense, what we all hope Wade can do for the defense. Kubiak doesn't need studs at every position to make them competitive. Had he been able to put those high draft picks on offense, maybe we could be that offense.....

5 years, long enough for me. I'm not arguing that Kubiak should have stayed. I think he should have gone. I do not agree with McNair, & I'm only trying to make sense of it, so I can move forward.

IMO, this is a bold move by McNair. & I'll be rooting for it to work.

Holy Mother of Pearl! I actually had to read this twice, TK. I'm still caught off-guard and flabbergasted that I agree with something you said.

Heh, heh, just messin with ya, bro

Double Barrel
02-03-2011, 03:12 PM
I'll be rooting for it to work.

I feel confident that this is a statement that 99.9% of Texans fans will agree with.

We'll see how much confidence people have in Wade's words five years from now. I remember clearly, how we fans, & the media were confident that Gary's confidence would lead to more success than we've seen.

I think the difference is that Wade has been a HC for multiple teams with varying degrees of success, whereas this is Gary's first gig and the best he's been able to produce is a 9-7 record after six seasons. Wade's also got a winning record as a HC (82-59), had six winnings seasons (four of them double-digit wins & five trips to the playoffs), and even won a playoff game.

My own prediction is that Gary will continue to flounder and Wade will eventually take his place. And it will be Wade Phillips that takes this team to it's first playoff trip. I hope I'm wrong, as more season(s) that result in no playoffs is brutal, but I have absolutely no confidence in Kubiak as a HC at this point. Wade I can live with...not my first choice, but he's still heads and shoulders above Gary.