PDA

View Full Version : Interest in Pryce?


PRBronco
03-08-2005, 11:47 PM
Hey Texans fans, bronco fan here, i come in peace. Don't worry, I've got nothing but respect for the texans. I've heard that the texans are one of the teams interested in trading for pryce, and i've seen a lot of threads around here of you guys wanting to improve the D. Have you guys heard anything on the texans looking to trade for him? What do you guys think about him? Thanks

P.S. So jealous that you guys resigned payne, i wanted us to grab him!

Beastlyman2003
03-09-2005, 12:05 AM
Shoot, how bout Jamie Sharper for Trevor Pryce? DO IT CASS!!! :thumbup

Fiddy
03-09-2005, 12:09 AM
Didnt Pryce only play 2 games last year???

PRBronco
03-09-2005, 12:10 AM
Hahaha, man, the last thing we need is more linebackers. Most of the fans on the broncos board are crapping their pants that we signed ian gold as it is.

PRBronco
03-09-2005, 12:11 AM
Didnt Pryce only play 2 games last year???

Yeah, he actually hurt his back playing against you guys in the preseason. It was a herniated disk that was pressing on a nerve. They fixed it all up and told us he'd be back by halloween, but then the nerve didn't "wake up" as fast as they predicted. They keep saying he'll be back at 100%, hopefully it doesn't hurt his status.

PRBronco
03-09-2005, 12:17 AM
I always figured he'd be a stud in a 3-4, cuz he's always been a DT/DE tweener. Houston's one of the few homes i'd be happy with him going to.

STEEL BLUE TEXANS
03-09-2005, 01:02 AM
We'll trade you Domanick Davis for Tatum Bell.

Grid
03-09-2005, 01:10 AM
ill trade you two pikachoos for your squirtle and the entire broncos oline.

TEXANS84
03-09-2005, 02:17 AM
ill trade you two pikachoos for your squirtle and the entire broncos oline.

Chop Blockers!

Just pokin fun PRBronco. Pryce would be a good fit in our system...I just don't see it happening this year.

PRBronco
03-09-2005, 02:46 AM
Chop Blockers!

Just pokin fun PRBronco. Pryce would be a good fit in our system...I just don't see it happening this year.

Hahaha, no worries man, looks like we're starting to make a shift towards real offensive linemen, who can actually push forward.

That's cool about pryce, i just haven't heard any word on him, and i'm dying for some info, thought there might have been some buzz over here, i'll check some other places.

Beastlyman2003
03-09-2005, 10:04 AM
We'll trade you Domanick Davis for Tatum Bell.

Wow. :confused: You would be alone in that boat. How non-sensical was that comment? :thumbdown

Fiddy
03-09-2005, 11:51 AM
Wow. :confused: You would be alone in that boat. How non-sensical was that comment? :thumbdownDid you even see Tatum Bell at the end of last season when the Broncos gave him carries over Droughns???

Game Logs: Look at the last 6 games (http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/492889/gamelogs/2004)

Lucky
03-09-2005, 12:03 PM
Look at Domanick's last 6 games. (http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/395946/gamelogs/2004) Both teams should probably hold on to what they've got.

STEEL BLUE TEXANS
03-09-2005, 12:14 PM
Tatum Bell has much more upside than DD. I would trade Davis for Bell in a heartbeat.

gg no re
03-09-2005, 12:55 PM
Steel Blue....

Have you learned anything from the Champ Bailey-Clinton Portis trade? Or the free agent adventures of Olandis Gary? Or Mike Anderson's one year stint as an HB, rushing for 1500?

I suppose I should bring that up.

Fiddy
03-09-2005, 01:36 PM
Look at Domanick's last 6 games. (http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/395946/gamelogs/2004) Both teams should probably hold on to what they've got.Just to clear my post up, I wasnt say we should or shouldnt. I was just wondering if Beastlyman knew who Tatum Bell was and if he had ever seen he play because Beastlyman sounded like he thought Steel Blue Texans was a moron for stating such a trade.


But I do agree with Steel Blue Texans that Bell has more upside because Bell can flat out run. Only downfall is Bell maybe less durable than Davis.

bckey
03-09-2005, 01:43 PM
Is Trevor Pryce a good cover LB? Thats what we need the most... If he is a rushing LB then forget it, we got plenty of those....


Trevor Pryce isn't a LB. He is a 6'5" 295 lb DE. He would probably cost too much for us to sign.

bckey
03-09-2005, 02:20 PM
According to the Broncos website he only played in 2 games last year. He had a lower back injury. He is 29 years old and will be 30 in August. I don't think we would sign him. We need some young blood to mix in with our veterans.

Hervoyel
03-09-2005, 02:32 PM
....keep saying he'll be back at 100%, hopefully it doesn't hurt his status.

How many times do I have to tell you people Tony Boselli ain't coming ba...oh nevermind, my mistake.

STEEL BLUE TEXANS
03-09-2005, 03:50 PM
Steel Blue....

Have you learned anything from the Champ Bailey-Clinton Portis trade? Or the free agent adventures of Olandis Gary? Or Mike Anderson's one year stint as an HB, rushing for 1500?

I suppose I should bring that up.





Yea, I learned Clinton Portis could still put up similar numbers to LaDanian Tomlinson (who is widely considered as the best RB in the NFL) even without the Bronco's offensive line. He also did this while facing 8 or 9 men in the box on a regular basis.

I suppose I should bring that up.

gg no re
03-09-2005, 04:08 PM
Similar numbers to LDT?!!!

Man, Clinton was averaging 3 YPC..... ANYONE could have LDT numbers if you got the ball 100 times a game.

Yeah, and DD was averaging more YPC, esp. when he got healthy.

All I'm saying that although Tatum may have more upside than DD, you need to factor in the fact that his stats are probably inflated because he is a Denver RB.

I mean, whatever happened to talk of Quentin Griffin being the next Barry Sanders? :p

Fiddy
03-09-2005, 04:09 PM
I mean, whatever happened to talk of Quentin Griffin being the enxt Barry Sanders? :pHe fumbled away a game against the Jags and then tore his ACL.

gg no re
03-09-2005, 04:12 PM
And that serves him right for being a Sooner. :)

STEEL BLUE TEXANS
03-09-2005, 04:53 PM
Similar numbers to LDT?!!!

Man, Clinton was averaging 3 YPC..... ANYONE could have LDT numbers if you got the ball 100 times a game.

Yeah, and DD was averaging more YPC, esp. when he got healthy.

All I'm saying that although Tatum may have more upside than DD, you need to factor in the fact that his stats are probably inflated because he is a Denver RB.

I mean, whatever happened to talk of Quentin Griffin being the next Barry Sanders? :p



Clinton Portis ran for 1315 yards at 3.8 YPC

LaDanian Tomlinson ran for 1335 yards at 3.9 YPC

I'd say those numbers are very similar.

PRBronco
03-09-2005, 05:51 PM
Hahaha, damn, i was hoping the secret would never get out that when we make a 1000 yard rusher, he's only good in denver!

But yeah, about tatum, we're dying to see what he can do as a full time starter, he played with a seperated shoulder in those games last year, but JESUS he's fast, faster than portis was for us, and that's saying something!

gg no re
03-09-2005, 07:49 PM
I'd say those numbers are very similar.You also forgot that LDT outscores Portis by 12 rushing TDs.

And let's not compare LDT's skills as a receiver vs. Portis [which is one of the defining abilities of LDT!]