PDA

View Full Version : would you sign..........


HouSportsWriter
03-11-2010, 02:53 PM
T.O? since he has not been taken would it be smart to take a chance with him

he can obivusly catch but i dont think he wants to be a back up to A. johnson

he would come cheap too seeing that no one wants him could the texans use him tho ?

i think if we get him he will boost A .johnson performance and kevins and daniels and even the runing back

and even matt would do beter

face it buffalo had a crappy qb and he had no chance there so i say we give the pore guy a chance at a decent contract and hope nothing stuped happens

who agrees

post in the poll

Ole Miss Texan
03-11-2010, 02:55 PM
Depends on his attitude and what Kubiak/Smith think of him if they can talk to him. I want to see more touches for Jacoby and have him continue his growth. Walter is a really good #2 for us. Only sign T.O. on a 1 year deal with little guaranteed so if he's acting up in training camp, preseason or early in the season you cut him and move on. TO would never agree to that so basically its a no. :)

BIG TORO
03-11-2010, 02:56 PM
I really think he is just not a good fit, nor do we want to spend any big money when we have other areas that need more attention.

HOU-TEX
03-11-2010, 02:57 PM
No.

Dread-Head
03-11-2010, 03:03 PM
Would I sign a receiver who always has to be double covered to play along side the best receiver in the league? Uh...Yeah!

False Start
03-11-2010, 03:06 PM
Hell no! :whistles:

Thorn
03-11-2010, 03:07 PM
I really think he is just not a good fit, nor do we want to spend any big money when we have other areas that need more attention.

This would be my first reaction, but if you wanted to stretch the defense, line up AJ, TO, JJ, and Andre Davis and have them run down the field. LOL

Grams
03-11-2010, 03:07 PM
He drops a lot of balls. I think the receivers we already have are better than TO.

HouSportsWriter
03-11-2010, 03:10 PM
Would I sign a receiver who always has to be double covered to play along side the best receiver in the league? Uh...Yeah!

i agree

Thorn
03-11-2010, 03:13 PM
Would I sign a receiver who always has to be double covered to play along side the best receiver in the league? Uh...Yeah!

You know, the more I think about that.......

If he came at a decent price......

But it wouldn't happen. Interesting to think about though.

HouSportsWriter
03-11-2010, 03:16 PM
You know, the more I think about that.......

If he came at a decent price......

But it wouldn't happen. Interesting to think about though.

you never no =-p

disaacks3
03-11-2010, 03:16 PM
The guy can be the epitome of a locker room cancer. Do you really want him talking to OD and Meco about how under-appreciated they are?

PASS

Texecutioner
03-11-2010, 03:17 PM
:roast::roast::roast::roast::roast:

2slik4u
03-11-2010, 03:17 PM
T.O? since he has not been taken would it be smart to take a chance with him

he can obivusly catch but i dont think he wants to be a back up to A. johnson

he would come cheap too seeing that no one wants him could the texans use him tho ?

i think if we get him he will boost A .johnson performance and kevins and daniels and even the runing back

and even matt would do beter

face it buffalo had a crappy qb and he had no chance there so i say we give the pore guy a chance at a decent contract and hope nothing stuped happens

who agrees

post in the poll

TO cannot catch. Him and Braylon Edwards continually lead the league in dropped passes. I dont want anything to do with his ego or his board hands.

HouSportsWriter
03-11-2010, 03:17 PM
The guy can be the epitome of a locker room cancer. Do you really want him talking to OD and Meco about how under-appreciated they are?

PASS

true but he has done alot beter away from the cowgirls locker room you got to admit it

steelbtexan
03-11-2010, 03:18 PM
No!!!

Texecutioner
03-11-2010, 03:26 PM
true but he has done alot beter away from the cowgirls locker room you got to admit it

No he didn't. He went off several times last season. It was just that he was such a non factor on the field and the Bills were such a shitty team that even the media didn't cover it like crazy like they had done in the past. The media doesn't care about the Bills and TO was not a huge factor on the field last season so it just wasn't highlighted like it had been in the past. But he did criticize his QB early on in the season and he did go off on the sidelines and yell at his teammates several times. He hasn't changed and he never will. He's messed up the chemistry of 3 different teams in this league. The Bills were already a mess before he got there.

For one, Bob Mcnair doesn't sign guys to come here if they even have traffic violations. There is no chance in this world that Bob would bring in TO and that is good.

Double Barrel
03-11-2010, 03:26 PM
No, thank you. Too much ego and selfishness to make him a good deal for a team struggling with identity issues.

Big Lou
03-11-2010, 03:42 PM
T.O? since he has not been taken would it be smart to take a chance with him

he can obivusly catch but i dont think he wants to be a back up to A. johnson

he would come cheap too seeing that no one wants him could the texans use him tho ?

i think if we get him he will boost A .johnson performance and kevins and daniels and even the runing back

and even matt would do beter

face it buffalo had a crappy qb and he had no chance there so i say we give the pore guy a chance at a decent contract and hope nothing stuped happens

who agrees

post in the poll

I would have to disagree, TO looks like that guy from the Replacements that needed the glue on his hands. I've watched TO get thrown 15 times in a game and only catch one!!!!! He has hands of stone.

Runner
03-11-2010, 04:07 PM
No, no, a thousand times no! The negatives far out weigh the positives. It isn't even close.

utahmark
03-11-2010, 05:00 PM
Would I sign a receiver who always has to be double covered to play along side the best receiver in the league? Uh...Yeah!

i did'nt watch him play last year but from what i hear no double's him anymore. am i wrong?

gary
03-11-2010, 06:01 PM
Would you sign David Carr?

HOU-TEX
03-11-2010, 06:03 PM
Would you sign David Carr?

Yes, he'd be Schaub's fluffer

Hervoyel
03-11-2010, 06:10 PM
Moot point. T.O. could literally transform into a 25 year old Jerry Rice before our eyes and the Texans wouldn't be interested in talking to him.

For the record I am not necessarily disagreeing with that. As always he brings significant positives and negatives to the table. I don't think the former outweighs the latter even now. As he has become less of an ass he's also become less of a threat.

ArlingtonTexan
03-11-2010, 06:11 PM
i did'nt watch him play last year but from what i hear no double's him anymore. am i wrong?

He wasn't consistently being doubled in Dallas his last year. And actually did not beat the jam as effectively as before.

Blazing Arrow
03-11-2010, 06:22 PM
I would have to disagree, TO looks like that guy from the Replacements that needed the glue on his hands. I've watched TO get thrown 15 times in a game and only catch one!!!!! He has hands of stone.

One of the most famous plays he is known for is that catch against Green Bay when he was on the 9ers. He got all of that praise for that one catch. The thing people do not bring up is he dropped 6 balls in that game that if he had just caught them the 9ers probably would not have even needed that last TD.

Personally I hope you get him so I can watch him implode your locker room.

WWJD
03-11-2010, 07:13 PM
I think Terrell's signature game is probably the Eagles SB when he played lights out after that horrible ankle injury.

Hmm I'm torn about him. He's been very good..maybe even considered excellent in past years but I think in the end he could have been so much more if he would have just played and left all the mental games he's played with teams off the board.

If I were an NFL player with his skills I'd rather when it's all over to be known for those skills and for not being a bonehead. I think Terrell will be known for both! And that's his doing.

Dutchrudder
03-12-2010, 10:39 AM
No.

b0ng
03-12-2010, 10:54 AM
Results speak for themselves. (voted no)