PDA

View Full Version : Three games. Three Running backs. Three long TD runs bounced around right tackle...


GP
09-27-2009, 09:03 PM
Bob McNair should make his defensive staff do one of those "Finish the pattern" tests.

Like this: ***!!!***!!!____ (Finish the sequence).

Somewhere earlier this afternoon, Richard Smith was sitting in a musty-smelling Lazy Boy chair. Nothing but boxers and old, ratty house slippers on. Empty beer cans strewn all over the floor around his feet. Eating a NightHawk salisbury steak TV dinner. And he jumps up, while watching that long TD run by MJD, and yells at the TV (while bumping his tray and spilling the corn) "I TOLD YOU SO! Read and REACT! Read and REACT!"

Laces out, Frank.

GP
09-27-2009, 09:07 PM
Discuss ways we can prevent the infamous "Long TD run around right tackle."

It's a tricky play, for sure, but there's got to be a defensive answer for this brilliantly crafted running play.

Time for Bob to hire a consultant.

GP
09-27-2009, 09:28 PM
Here was Frank Bush at a postgame news conference.

His answers were muffled, and barely audible to those in attendance.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/head_up_ass.jpg

Norg
09-27-2009, 09:30 PM
i think the system Bush runs when working gets more players in the back field and when working stops star running backs to Negative yds but when not working can give up the big play more easily

i guess the old system had more of the Dline men playing zone in the soft underbelly this new one we see none of that

hradhak
09-27-2009, 09:33 PM
I think it works because our LBs and D-line are relatively decent at tackling. The problem is our secondary sucks so hard we can't trust them to do anything.

TexanBacker93
09-27-2009, 09:36 PM
i think the system Bush runs when working gets more players in the back field and when working stops star running backs to Negative yds but when not working can give up the big play more easily

i guess the old system had more of the Dline men playing zone in the soft underbelly this new one we see none of that

I think we've seen more negative plays out of the defense than in the past. They do need tackling from the secondary, though. That's a killer.

Norg
09-27-2009, 09:39 PM
yes and also if we had some more pressure on the QB we could get bye on a sub par secondary because they would have the quick drop and getting the QB outta Pocket and messing up his routes and timing and what not but that didnt happen.....

hradhak
09-27-2009, 09:41 PM
yes and also if we had some more pressure on the QB we could get bye on a sub par secondary because they would have the quick drop and getting the QB outta Pocket and messing up his routes and timing and what not but that didnt happen.....

well the QB pressure was pretty dismal. I did see Garrard flat on his butt a few times but for he was able to get the ball off without too much trouble. I don't know how to change that.

Norg
09-27-2009, 09:44 PM
well the QB pressure was pretty dismal. I did see Garrard flat on his butt a few times but for he was able to get the ball off without too much trouble. I don't know how to change that.

i know how

Take Amobi out Move Antintino or Robonison to DT and put like Casey and Bullman on DE ......

i dont know we got two do something with that Dline

We also need reeves back in a bad way ..... even if he sucks he better then the suck we got now at CB