PDA

View Full Version : Bears: Briggs Wants To Be Traded


Exithios
03-05-2007, 10:16 AM
Briggs doesn't seem to like the franchise tag and the 1 year deal that it entails.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788148

Found it interesting, but he would carry a hefty trade value to say the least.

texans83
03-05-2007, 10:18 AM
Yea, he is seeing what everone else is getting in free agency and he wants to try and test it too. Dont know if he could. Texans deff couldnt afford him this year but he would be a great asset.

kastofsna
03-05-2007, 10:37 AM
well he says he wants to play in miami.

IshouldbeGM
03-05-2007, 12:35 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788148


I'd give up our 2nd rd pick for him.

#1 laron landry

#2 lance briggs

#3 o-line

#4 o-line

Exithios
03-05-2007, 12:36 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788148


I'd give up our 2nd rd pick for him.

#1 laron landry

#2 lance briggs

#3 o-line

#4 o-line

http://forums.houstontexans.com/showthread.php?t=36139

El Amigo Invisible
03-05-2007, 12:39 PM
Is he worthy of a second pick? As always, alot of top notch talent will slip in to the second round (Like Bennie J and Gabar Gaffney HA HA HA). Seriously, is there any other way we could get him besides giving up a draft pick?

kcwilson
03-05-2007, 12:46 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788148


I'd give up our 2nd rd pick for him.

#1 laron landry

#2 lance briggs

#3 o-line

#4 o-line

Only if you can reach agreement on an extension... and unfortunately, I am not sure the Bears would go for a 2nd rounder only.

michaelm
03-05-2007, 12:46 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788148


I'd give up our 2nd rd pick for him.

#1 laron landry

#2 lance briggs

#3 o-line

#4 o-line

A mid round pick who is now crying about being franchised and paid the average of the top 5 players at his position, $7mil + per year?

You hate to get into that whole 'lack of respect' thing," Briggs said. "But you play four years for a team, do your best, exceed their expectations, right? And every year, it's like, 'You played great, Lance.' And they kind of dangle the carrot, like they're going to take care of you, and then it doesn't happen.

Doesn't happen? WTF do you call being paid $7.206 million per? One of the TOP FIVE at your position...

Waaa, Waaa, Waaa... I thought I'd want Briggs before, but I think I'll pass on this crybaby now...


*edit* If he's upset about the lack of a long term deal, that puts it in a different light, to a degree... but if that's the case, he should just say so.

TexansCanes
03-05-2007, 01:21 PM
Lance is no different than any player that gets franchised. being franchised isn't where the money is at and it is one more year taken off your career. you get one chance to cash in big and now he has one more year to risk injury before his big contract. plus, they say the bears have been low balling him which isn't a surprise considering the bears recent history with negotiations.

it would take a lot more than a second rounder to get lance, try two firsts. it would be a no brainier for every team if he could be had for only a second.

Carr Bombed
03-05-2007, 01:31 PM
A mid round pick who is now crying about being franchised and paid the average of the top 5 players at his position, $7mil + per year?



Doesn't happen? WTF do you call being paid $7.206 million per? One of the TOP FIVE at your position...

Waaa, Waaa, Waaa... I thought I'd want Briggs before, but I think I'll pass on this crybaby now...


*edit* If he's upset about the lack of a long term deal, that puts it in a different light, to a degree... but if that's the case, he should just say so.

Its about the signing bonus, football is a violent sport where a career can be over in one play. Players don't like to be franchised because they then are left risking never getting the "BIG payday" in signing bonus money. Missing out on 30 mil would make me a little upset too, it is a business. They should change it where on top of the 7 mil a year base salary, teams should also have to throw in a additional 10 mil sign on bonus for that one year too. That would totally do away with all the bad blood between tagged players and FO's

michaelm
03-05-2007, 01:44 PM
Its about the signing bonus, fooball is a violent sport where a career can be over in one play. Players don't like to be franchised because they then are left risking never getting the "BIG payday" in signing bonus money. Missing out on 30 mil would make me a little upset too, it is a business. They should change it where on top of the 7 mil a year base salary, teams should also have to throw in a additional 10 mil sign on bonus for that one year too. That would totally do away with all the bad blood between tagged players and FO's

I get your point, but it just rubs me the wrong way when a player making that much money says he just flat out refuses to play for his team...

Hottoddie
03-05-2007, 02:11 PM
I say we trade for him & sign him to a 50 year $200 million contract with a $10 million signing bonus. :D

macaronitoni
03-05-2007, 06:02 PM
Looks like Briggs is hell bent to get "unfranchised" and get out of Chicago.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788148

On a side note, Anyone willing to take a chance on Drew Stanton? With out OL, he might just be the right fit.

Navy_Chris
03-05-2007, 06:03 PM
Looks like Briggs is hell bent to get "unfranchised" and get out of Chicago.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788148

On a side note, Anyone willing to take a chance on Drew Stanton? With out OL, he might just be the right fit.

It would be nice. What would we give up to get him, though?

Clash_Fan3605
03-05-2007, 06:06 PM
I would be willing to trade a 2nd & 3rd, & a 2nd next year for Briggs. (As long as we draft LaRon Landry for our first pick)

jdm12
03-05-2007, 06:07 PM
With our cap situation and not wanting to give up draft picks, getting Briggs it is highly unlikely.

J

kiwitexansfan
03-05-2007, 06:08 PM
Prising Briggs away from Chicago would be expensive, signing Briggs even if they let him go would also be expensive.

I would think that it would be best to steer clear and address our other areas of need, rather than blowing our cap on a LB who may just be a result of the system and being part of a great defense.

Clash_Fan3605
03-05-2007, 06:08 PM
Yeah, there is virtually no way we get Briggs. Maybe on Madden or something...

TexanFan881
03-05-2007, 07:18 PM
Would I want to? Yes. Will we? No. I can't see it happening in a million years.

Ole Miss Texan
03-05-2007, 08:06 PM
I would be willing to trade a 2nd & 3rd, & a 2nd next year for Briggs. (As long as we draft LaRon Landry for our first pick)

I like Briggs alot and he'd be awesome here in houston next to demeco. but I don't think we need to trade our DAY 1 picks away..esp that many for 1 player. In 3 years if we are 1 good linebacker away from the Superbowl...something may get done...but not in the next 2 years...imo.