PDA

View Full Version : Super Bowl Colts: 22 of 24 drafted


TwinSisters
02-08-2007, 11:51 PM
I know this has made the rounds before in NFL circles, but I want to repost it for the offseason review:

The Super Bowl Colts 2006 played with 22 of their starters drafted in house with only two FAs ( the kicker and DT ).

and from 1996 starting with Harrison, they never missed in the first round.
( maybe Jackson counts as a miss, only because of the Harper thing )

( not counting Special Teams or depth )

The majority of their players were drafted late due to the success of the team ( 11 years, 8 winning seasons, 8 post-season shows )

Scooter
02-08-2007, 11:58 PM
i believe the steelers were 19 or 20 out of 22 starters also. that's why the rooneys and polian are thought so highly of, while dan snyder and matt millen are the goats. teams are built through the draft, that hasnt changed in decades.

edit: jeff hartings and kimo von oelhoffen are the only starters not drafted (or signed as undrafted) by the steelers that i can think of.

TwinSisters
02-09-2007, 12:49 AM
i believe the steelers were 19 or 20 out of 22 starters also. that's why the rooneys and polian are thought so highly of, while dan snyder and matt millen are the goats. teams are built through the draft, that hasnt changed in decades.

edit: jeff hartings and kimo von oelhoffen are the only starters not drafted (or signed as undrafted) by the steelers that i can think of.

I don't remember their roster and don't have quick copy of their Super Bowl Team.

Farrior I think was starting ( FA ).

But still, they too didn't miss a lot in the first round since 1996... while still drafting fairly low. The highest they ever drafted was 8th Overall Plaxico.

Ole Miss Texan
02-09-2007, 01:50 AM
i honestly think thats how we are going to be after a few years. maybe its a little presumpuous of me...but last year's draft was amazing in my opinion. I really believe our drafts in the future will be similar to last years.

mario-started
demeco-started
spencers-started twice? till injured
winston-did he ever start? few games??at the end
daniels-started
moulds pick---good one
lundy-started beginning of season?
anderson?-didn't start

look at our rookies that really made an impact on our team...that's amazing to me. i like how it looks like our FO is rebuilding our team...and starting with the draft NOT free agency. thats the right way to build it long term...FA is just quick fixes for the most part..

Silver Oak
02-09-2007, 08:15 AM
I would hope that we get that lucky again and again, but the draft can be a crap shoot.

TwinSisters
02-09-2007, 09:49 AM
I would hope that we get that lucky again and again, but the draft can be a crap shoot.

That's what is interesting though about the Colts. It hasn't been a crap shoot. Unless they rolled 11 straight natural sevens.

EDIT: Well, not really I guess. I forgot about the liquored up kicker... that might count as a snake eyes.

Texans Horror
02-09-2007, 11:47 AM
This is why it's important for the Texans to be able to play all their picks and limit their FA signings. It's why I think they should look to their needs over BPA. (The benefit in the first round is that I think BPA will be pretty much equal to their pick. I can't see Alan Branch, Jamal Anderson, Adriane Peterson, or even Levi Brown being a step backwards for the Texans.)

I expect a lot of FA pickups to be quietly shown the door over the next few years as they play out their contract, players like Putzier, Salaam, and Flanagan. They are only here while the team develops. How long Moulds, Dayne, and Weaver will last is up to the fates.

OzzO
02-09-2007, 01:09 PM
I would hope that we get that lucky again and again, but the draft can be a crap shoot.

Only if you view 2 game tapes on a player, trade away 2 of your draft picks, and inform the owner that's how they do it in the nfl - then go get that player you think you did enough research on.

TwinSisters
02-09-2007, 01:54 PM
This is why it's important for the Texans to be able to play all their picks and limit their FA signings. It's why I think they should look to their needs over BPA. (The benefit in the first round is that I think BPA will be pretty much equal to their pick. I can't see Alan Branch, Jamal Anderson, Adriane Peterson, or even Levi Brown being a step backwards for the Texans.)

I expect a lot of FA pickups to be quietly shown the door over the next few years as they play out their contract, players like Putzier, Salaam, and Flanagan. They are only here while the team develops. How long Moulds, Dayne, and Weaver will last is up to the fates.


to be honest, I don't know what to say... I have to scratch my chin a lot when I find ONE FA starter on the whole team ( Off and Def, sure the kicker matters ).

The Pats I think carry 5 to 6.
The Cowboys certainly brought in a lot of FA's.
The Seahawks have had at least 4 to 5 each season.

The Saints... are loaded with FA's.

TwinSisters
02-11-2007, 09:00 AM
I went back and looked at the Saints depth chart

over 50% of the starters are new. All the linebackers, half the secondary, bits of the OL and DL, QB, TE, one WR, and then whatever you would call Bush.

A good bulk of these players are FAs.