PDA

View Full Version : Sportsline ranks Texans 19 of 32


TexansLucky13
10-23-2006, 03:10 PM
http://sportsline.com/nfl/playerrankings/regularseason/TEAM

It is based off of player performance and stuff like that. Just thought it was interesting.

David is also ranked as the 11th best QB. Not too shabby. Haha... all of you people who said that Carr wasn't a top 10 QB were right... but he is darn close!

:gotexans1

Sarg01
10-23-2006, 03:28 PM
I'm not at all sure I disagree with those rankings. I might give the Ravens, Jaguars and Redskins a bit more credit and knock Green Bay back pretty far. The bottom 7 teams are 7 of the 8 teams that I consider markedly worse than the Texans.

eriadoc
10-23-2006, 03:30 PM
The top 10, according to that site:

1. McNabb
2. P. Manning
3. Bulger
4. Joey Harrington
5. E. Manning
6. Brees
7. Rivers
8. Culpepper
9. Kitna
10. Palmer

So their list leaves a lot to be desired, IMO. Culpepper can't be on that list if they expect credibility.

They also list AJ as the 7th-best WR, when he has more catches and receptions than any of the six listed ahead of him.

real
10-23-2006, 03:33 PM
The top 10, according to that site:

1. McNabb
2. P. Manning
3. Bulger
4. Joey Harrington
5. E. Manning
6. Brees
7. Rivers
8. Culpepper
9. Kitna
10. Palmer


Those two names in their top ten makes me wonder...

NEROtheZERO
10-23-2006, 03:33 PM
Nice to see but those rankings are assinine.

HOU-TEX
10-23-2006, 03:44 PM
Those two names in their top ten makes me wonder...

1. McNabb
2. P. Manning
3. Bulger
4. Joey Harrington
5. E. Manning
6. Brees
7. Rivers
8. Culpepper
9. Kitna
10. Palmer

Make that three names for me.

kcwilson
10-23-2006, 04:29 PM
The top 10, according to that site:

1. McNabb
2. P. Manning
3. Bulger
4. Joey Harrington
5. E. Manning
6. Brees
7. Rivers
8. Culpepper
9. Kitna
10. Palmer

So their list leaves a lot to be desired, IMO. Culpepper can't be on that list if they expect credibility.

They also list AJ as the 7th-best WR, when he has more catches and receptions than any of the six listed ahead of him.


Harrington has a qb rating of 64.1... he has a lifetime rating of 67.8. That has to be a typo. They probably meant Pennington.

TexansLucky13
10-23-2006, 04:40 PM
Harrington has a qb rating of 64.1... he has a lifetime rating of 67.8. That has to be a typo. They probably meant Pennington.

I agree with that assessment.

IMO David should be either the 7th or 8th best in the league. You guys all know me though...

Biggest Carr :homer: on the MB according to some

Double Barrel
10-23-2006, 04:48 PM
The top 10, according to that site:

1. McNabb
2. P. Manning
3. Bulger
4. Joey Harrington
5. E. Manning
6. Brees
7. Rivers
8. Culpepper
9. Kitna
10. Palmer

So their list leaves a lot to be desired, IMO. Culpepper can't be on that list if they expect credibility.

They also list AJ as the 7th-best WR, when he has more catches and receptions than any of the six listed ahead of him.

No doubt. With a list like that, I cannot find anything about them credible. We've seen Culpepper in person, and he stinks this year!

run-david-run
10-23-2006, 08:17 PM
Lol, two of the top ten qb's in the league have combined to drive a pre-season title contender to a 1-6 record! Anyway, AJ being at 7 when he is clearly top four in terms of production so far this year (Smith, Holt, Harrison and AJ) tells you all you need to know.

Hutch13
10-23-2006, 09:37 PM
Demeco Ryans is number 3 for LB, ahead of Urlacher. Not bad.

HoustonFan
10-24-2006, 08:27 AM
The top 10, according to that site:

1. McNabb
2. P. Manning
3. Bulger
4. Joey Harrington
5. E. Manning
6. Brees
7. Rivers
8. Culpepper
9. Kitna
10. Palmer



ARE THEY SERIOUS?????:yikes: And Carr didn't make top 10?? Wow. Unfreakinbelievable.

bah007
10-24-2006, 10:32 AM
the reason Harrington is up there is cuz he throws for so many yds. But I guess you should hit 400 if you put it up 62 times

kastofsna
10-24-2006, 10:42 AM
ahahah and miami is ranked 20th. what a joke.

TexansLucky13
10-24-2006, 12:20 PM
ahahah and miami is ranked 20th. what a joke.

Do you think they should be higher, or what? I can't detect your tone over the internet so I dont know if you are cursing under your breath or if you are being sarcastic.

bah007
10-24-2006, 12:23 PM
Do you think they should be higher, or what? I can't detect your tone over the internet so I dont know if you are cursing under your breath or if you are being sarcastic.

keep in mind that they were a popular super bowl pick in the preseason. Media doesnt want to throw them in the dumpster just yet