PDA

View Full Version : Cincinnati Trail Blazers take Ahmad Brooks


HoustonFrog
07-13-2006, 02:12 PM
Wow, you'd think after the past off season that maybe they wouldn't take this shot but the Bengals gave up a 3rd for Ahmad Brooks!

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2518193

real
07-13-2006, 02:15 PM
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!! @ the title of this thread....

CloakNNNdagger
07-13-2006, 02:44 PM
Wow, you'd think after the past off season that maybe they wouldn't take this shot but the Bengals gave up a 3rd for Ahmad Brooks!

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2518193

It looks like the Bengals are giving a lot of players a chance to get used to stripes on their uniforms before then end up at county.:locked:

HoustonFrog
07-13-2006, 03:52 PM
Hopefully Chris Henry isn't their campus tour guide:hunter:

Coach C.
07-13-2006, 04:47 PM
Good pick for them and should fit right in. He is a good runstopper and a decent pass rusher. So why not take a chance. Should be interesting to see how he fits in.

cptnbreakdance
07-13-2006, 06:14 PM
Front page of NFL.com, Cinci used their 3rd rounder on him. I cant help but think it was a mistake not to take him w/ our 3rd. Tallent wise, we dont really have a chance of drafting anyone of his caliber in the 3rd next year, especially at the MLB possision. Thoughts...

TheOgre
07-13-2006, 06:38 PM
This has been posted already.

Maddict5
07-13-2006, 08:42 PM
odell thurman????

PapaL
07-13-2006, 09:24 PM
odell thurman????

Thats the bigger news:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2518607


The tumultuous offseason of the Cincinnati Bengals continued Thursday when two league sources and one source close to Odell Thurman confirmed that the starting middle linebacker has been suspended for four games for a violation of the NFL's substance abuse policy.

The suspension for the first month of the campaign, which had been rumored for much of the offseason, might explain in part the Bengals' decision to select former University of Virginia linebacker Ahmad Brooks in Thursday afternoon's supplemental draft.

TexanFan881
07-13-2006, 10:00 PM
I wish we would have spent a 3rd on him...but we're still fine with Greenwood, Cowart, Ryans, and Orr. It's still always nice to add some young talented players though.

wags
07-13-2006, 10:04 PM
This was an issue with him at Georgia, and he did end up going to a military academy at one point. Lot of good it did him. :ok:

In 2002, Odell was kicked off of the Georgia team for violating several
team rules and spent the rest of the season at the
Georgia Military Academy where he still had problems
adhering to team rules. Back with Georgia in 2004,
Thurman was again suspended...this time for the first three games of the season. But the talent outweighed
the risks for the Bengals, and Thurman was made a part of the Cincinnati franchise.

http://bengals.scout.com/2/539804.html

CloakNNNdagger
07-13-2006, 10:42 PM
Thats the bigger news:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2518607


Quote:
The tumultuous offseason of the Cincinnati Bengals continued Thursday when two league sources and one source close to Odell Thurman confirmed that the starting middle linebacker has been suspended for four games for a violation of the NFL's substance abuse policy.

The suspension for the first month of the campaign, which had been rumored for much of the offseason, might explain in part the Bengals' decision to select former University of Virginia linebacker Ahmad Brooks in Thursday afternoon's supplemental draft.
8888888888888888888888888888888888888888

That's the link I meant to post in my last post, but inadvertently posted the original thread link instead........sorry 'bout that........my comment then would make much more sense to you.

You might check out this link that refers to a post I made in our "College" section (which contains a link) referring to this same occurence. THURMAN (http://www.houstontexans.com/fan_zone/messageboards/showthread.php?t=23150&page=2) (look near the bottom)

Hutch13
07-13-2006, 11:39 PM
Man, the bengals are turning into the jailblazers of the NFL

WildBlackBear32
07-14-2006, 12:07 AM
Hilarious....they pick up one player with a drug problem after another play with a drug problem gets suspended. One step forward and two steps back as always for the Bengals.

TexansMVP
07-14-2006, 12:15 AM
Although the guy has his fair share of problems in the past, I do think he is steal for a 3rd round pick. I mean after all we did spend some 3rd round picks in Dave Ragone (who we gave up for free) and Vernand Morency who has been sitting on the sideline. Brooks IMO was definitely worth a 3rd based on his potential and could have given us some depth at the LB position.

nunusguy
07-14-2006, 08:41 AM
Hilarious....they pick up one player with a drug problem after another play with a drug problem gets suspended. One step forward and two steps back as always for the Bengals.
Man, you got that right. The Bengals are becoming the "Home of 'Hoods".
This also establishs Bengals coach Marvin Lewis as one of the NFLs top windbags, given his recent pledges about taking character into consideration
when selecting players:
" In fact, three days before the draft, Lewis made a point of saying the Bengals would pay more attention to character issues this year."
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?p=750856
I dunno, maybe Lewis meant he was going to go out of his ways to take
knuckleheads with charcter issues, because he now has a collection of real
character duds on his team.

CloakNNNdagger
07-14-2006, 09:32 AM
Man, you got that right. The Bengals are becoming the "Home of 'Hoods".
This also establishs Bengals coach Marvin Lewis as one of the NFLs top windbags, given his recent pledges about taking character into consideration
when selecting players:
" In fact, three days before the draft, Lewis made a point of saying the Bengals would pay more attention to character issues this year."
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?p=750856
I dunno, maybe Lewis meant he was going to go out of his ways to take
knuckleheads with charcter issues, because he now has a collection of real
character duds on his team.
**********

There's certainly a question of if it's Lewis or Brown (owner) or both are responsible for this last choice:

BROWN MADE THE CALL ON BROOKS

A league source tells us that, although Bengals coach Marvin Lewis has plenty of influence over the composition of his team's roster, the decision to select Virginia linebacker Ahmad Brooks in the third round of the Supplemental Draft came from owner Mike Brown.

Our guess? Lewis is putting the word out that Brown made the decision in order to deflect a mounting storm of criticism regarding the team's addition on Marvin's watch of guys like Chris Henry and A.J. Nicholson and Odell Thurman and Frostee Rucker and Fahu Tahi.

Even if Brown did in fact make the decision, we wonder what if anything Marvin had to say as the boss was pondering the possibility. Did the coach say, "You know, this guy's college coach is putting out the word that the kid is a turd, and there are reports he failed multiple drug tests"? Or did Marvin merely keep his mouth shut and let nature take its course?

For the rest of the story (http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm)

edo783
07-14-2006, 03:32 PM
They said they would be paying attention to charicter issues this year.....guess they are just focusing on the bad ones.

Texans>Colts
07-14-2006, 04:16 PM
Who the hell are the Cincinnati Trail Blazers:homer:

Porky
07-14-2006, 04:27 PM
I heard Nate Newton is the new GM, and Michael Irvin is the new HC.

texasguy346
07-14-2006, 04:44 PM
I believe they also picked up A.J. Nicholson. Yet another LB with character issues.

CloakNNNdagger
07-15-2006, 02:41 AM
Brown must have been a great song and dance vaudeville man in his younger days...........evidently from all that jostling around, in his older age his brain has suffered a major disconnect.:

July 14, 2006

Posted: 2:15 p.m.


Brown

Bengals owner Mike Brown released the following statement Friday in response to questions about the team's recent character issues:

“We want our fans to know that we share their concerns regarding the recent off-field conduct of several Bengals players. We expect our players to be good citizens, as most are, and we hold them accountable for their conduct under team and league rules.

“We are closely monitoring these matters. All are currently pending and they will be addressed in accordance with the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement, including possible disciplinary action.

“Regarding this week’s selection of Ahmad Brooks in the supplemental draft, we are aware of no pending allegations of any kind against Ahmad. The club’s judgment is that any past transgressions were insufficient to deny him an opportunity to prove himself as a responsible NFL player.
“Coach Lewis and I look forward to meeting with our local media at our annual Pre-Training Camp Luncheon on July 26. As usual at this event, we will both be available to respond to any and all questions.”


link (http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=5329)

mancunian
07-15-2006, 06:50 PM
Wow, you'd think after the past off season that maybe they wouldn't take this shot but the Bengals gave up a 3rd for Ahmad Brooks!

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2518193

shouldn't the the Thread have been called Cincinnati Jail Blazers....or why we get into trouble?