PDA

View Full Version : Those who fail to study history...


Runner
10-13-2005, 04:48 AM
...are doomed to repeat it.

Todd Wade, from the article http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/sports/fb/texansfront/3394201

Victor Riley and Todd Wade shared repetitions at right tackle.

"It's my job to lose," said Wade, who has started at right tackle with the Texans since last season. "Competition's always good.


Wade needs to talk to Wando to see what he thinks of that statement.

Kaiser Toro
10-13-2005, 04:52 AM
Nice to see a good article with some honest refelction from Wade and I agree 100%:
"It's my job to lose," said Wade, who has started at right tackle with the Texans since last season. "Competition's always good. I've been somewhat dominating on the running game, but the last couple of weeks my pass protection hasn't been so good. It's got to improve. I'm not surprised. When you're 0-4, you've got to do something and do it quick."

Runner
10-13-2005, 08:17 AM
Nice to see a good article with some honest refelction ...

I thought this was pretty honest too - and the fans should heed the implied warning. There is some difficulty in Pitts moving from guard to tackle, as he admits:

"There are a lot of little nuances about tackle that I'm going to have to get back in the swing of early, but I feel like I'll be able to go out there and compete and do a good job against anybody in the league," Pitts said. "It's harder at tackle because you're dealing with better athletes who move better. They make you move your feet, and the more you move your feet the more chances you have to get out of balance.

TheOgre
10-13-2005, 08:31 AM
Which would you rather have?

1. Pitts, McKinney, Hodgdon, Wiegert, Wade (Riley)
OR
2. Pitts, Brown, McKinney, Wiegert, Wade (Riley)

Coach C.
10-13-2005, 08:34 AM
Neither. I would rather have Pitts, Weigert, McKinney, Wade, Wand.

William.carter
10-13-2005, 08:39 AM
I'd rather see the rookie in there. With two veteran Guards at his side, this might be the best senario for him to be brought into the line-up that we'll see this season anyway. Give him a shot, what could it hurt.

Ibar_Harry
10-13-2005, 08:58 AM
In this case competition is not good, because it means no one is improving. I would hope that it is clear cut who is the best. I'm tired of seeing people moving in and out because there is no clear winner. That's true for almost everyone except DRob, DD, AJ and Carr. Mathis might also fit into that group and of course the kickers. There are simply not many people on this ball club who you would say are not replaceable. And, Yes David is by far our best QB. That might not be saying much for some of you, but that is the truth.

BigBull17
10-13-2005, 09:05 AM
I'd rather see the rookie in there. With two veteran Guards at his side, this might be the best senario for him to be brought into the line-up that we'll see this season anyway. Give him a shot, what could it hurt.
.....Carr.....

TEXANS84
10-13-2005, 09:13 AM
Sorry, but I'd like to see it like this:

Pitts, McKinney, Washington, Weigert, Wade

Exascor
10-13-2005, 09:37 AM
Sorry, but I'd like to see it like this:

Pitts, McKinney, Washington, Weigert, WadeThat line sounds good to me. I'm not a big Washington fan (lead feet) but the little he played at C he seemed to perform better than McKinney. He should know the line calls (unlike Hodgdon) as well which might allow McKinney to just block...that would be a good thing.

Hervoyel
10-13-2005, 09:51 AM
Which would you rather have?

1. Pitts, McKinney, Hodgdon, Wiegert, Wade (Riley)
OR
2. Pitts, Brown, McKinney, Wiegert, Wade (Riley)


The line should have stayed as it was when the 2004 season ended. Basically the obvious starting point for this years line was...

WAND - PITTS- McKINNEY - WEIGERT - WADE

That is with no real quality free agents arriving during the off-season (I don't count Victor Riley). Had we been able to land Pace of course then Wand sits but generally I think you being where you left off in 2004.

From that point I'd make changes as needed. If McKinney was getting used in the middle all the time I'd look at Hodgdon but I'd probably try Washington first.

Vinny
10-13-2005, 09:52 AM
The line should have stayed as it was when the 2004 season ended. Basically the obvious starting point for this years line was...

WAND - PITTS- McKINNEY - WEIGERT - WADE

That is with no real quality free agents arriving during the off-season (I don't count Victor Riley). Had we been able to land Pace of course then Wand sits but generally I think you being where you left off in 2004.

From that point I'd make changes as needed. If McKinney was getting used in the middle all the time I'd look at Hodgdon but I'd probably try Washington first.But Herv....that means you would have to only replace players if they were BEATEN OUT by actual play. You know we just hand players positions and "coach them up"....what's wrong with you anyway?

William.carter
10-13-2005, 10:16 AM
.....Carr.....

I doubt he would be in any more danger than he is in now.

Hervoyel
10-13-2005, 10:55 AM
But Herv....that means you would have to only replace players if they were BEATEN OUT by actual play. You know we just hand players positions and "coach them up"....what's wrong with you anyway?


I'm sorry guys. I take that all back. I don't know what I was thinking.

touttail
10-13-2005, 04:24 PM
Neither. I would rather have Pitts, Weigert, McKinney, Wade, Wand.

None of the above!!
I vote with the Coach.

bobby 119C :brickwall