PDA

View Full Version : Sloan Thomas or Corey Bradford


NeViKaN
09-04-2005, 02:10 PM
Hmmmm. Sloan great hands and had a great pre-season. Corey....didn't we already release him once? Atleast we kept Armstrong. It seems that we keep forcing the ball to Corey with no results. What do ya'll think? :confused:

TommyS
09-04-2005, 02:12 PM
if you jump over and read the Cut Day threads, i think you'll see a definate trend emerge:

Bradford - Bad

Thomas - Good (Longhorn bias? maybe)

NeViKaN
09-04-2005, 02:23 PM
I know I jumped the gun. Sorry. I see that Hollings is here.

edo783
09-04-2005, 02:46 PM
Isn't doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome the definition of insanity? Keeping Bradfrod and Hollings seems to fit that to a tee.

rmartin65
09-04-2005, 02:55 PM
id take thomas

Corrosion
09-04-2005, 03:02 PM
They didnt CUT Bradford , his contract had expired .

At any rate I take S. Thomas over him ..... Longhorn Bias , Maybe :texflag:

William.carter
09-04-2005, 03:56 PM
They didnt CUT Bradford , his contract had expired .

At any rate I take S. Thomas over him ..... Longhorn Bias , Maybe :texflag:

I'm an Aggie and i'd take Sloan over Bradford any day of the week and twice on Sundays!

TexHorns
09-04-2005, 05:11 PM
They didnt CUT Bradford , his contract had expired .

At any rate I take S. Thomas over him ..... Longhorn Bias , Maybe :texflag:


Didn't they give him a one deal year though?

Corrosion
09-04-2005, 05:13 PM
Didn't they give him a one deal year though?


Yes , Bradfords deal is for One season at $1 million ... Lets hope this is his last as a Texan .

angeltexus
09-04-2005, 05:19 PM
Hmmmm. Sloan great hands and had a great pre-season. Corey....didn't we already release him once? Atleast we kept Armstrong. It seems that we keep forcing the ball to Corey with no results. What do ya'll think? :confused:Sloan great hands, no speed. Corey great hands lightning fast.. Go figure.. :texflag:

Corrosion
09-04-2005, 05:39 PM
Sloan great hands, no speed. Corey great hands lightning fast.. Go figure.. :texflag:


Sloan no speed ? .... if 4.45 is slow .... then :ok:

Bradford Great Hands ? :pigfly: .... Maybe if he's got STICKEM on them .... Oh wait , they outlawed that stuff back in the 70's . :brickwall

CyberTexan
09-04-2005, 05:40 PM
I have been one to say along time ago that Bradford drops alot of balls but then i got jumped on here in the forum , im glad too see alot of you are starting to agree , In my opinion Sloan should have stayed and Bradford gone.

Corrosion
09-04-2005, 05:40 PM
:deadhorse :deadhorse :deadhorse

ATX
09-04-2005, 05:41 PM
I see it like this. Even if Bradford is better than Sloan at this point in time, Bradford isn't the long term solution. Everyone pray that nobody picks Sloan up so we can keep him on our practive squad. :texflag:

angeltexus
09-04-2005, 05:54 PM
I see it like this. Even if Bradford is better than Sloan at this point in time, Bradford isn't the long term solution. Everyone pray that nobody picks Sloan up so we can keep him on our practive squad. :texflag:
If I am correct you saw Sloan at Texas and he was not all that. Theres a diffrence between reg season and preseason. We gave this cat 2 chances and he keeps coming up short. I actually do pray he joins another team so yall can talk about something else already. Texans know what they want and it aint Thomas. :texflag: